WallStSmart

Kenon Holdings (KEN)vsSociedad Quimica y Minera de Chile SA ADR B (SQM)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Sociedad Quimica y Minera de Chile SA ADR B generates 491% more annual revenue ($4.58B vs $774.30M). KEN leads profitability with a 63.8% profit margin vs 12.9%. SQM earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 66/100 (B-).

KEN

Hold

44

out of 100

Grade: D

Growth: 5.3Profit: 6.0Value: 5.0Quality: 9.0
Piotroski: 7/9Altman Z: 2.05

SQM

Strong Buy

66

out of 100

Grade: B-

Growth: 6.7Profit: 7.0Value: 9.3Quality: 7.3
Piotroski: 6/9Altman Z: 2.01
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

Intrinsic value data unavailable for KEN.

SQMUndervalued (+22.0%)

Margin of Safety

+22.0%

Fair Value

$96.41

Current Price

$79.16

$17.25 discount

UndervaluedFair: $96.41Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

KEN2 strengths · Avg: 9.5/10
Profit MarginProfitability
63.8%10/10

Keeps 64 of every $100 in revenue as profit

Return on EquityProfitability
24.1%9/10

Every $100 of equity generates 24 in profit

SQM4 strengths · Avg: 9.0/10
PEG RatioValuation
0.4610/10

Growing faster than its price suggests

EPS GrowthGrowth
52.3%10/10

Earnings expanding 52.3% YoY

Operating MarginProfitability
28.3%8/10

Strong operational efficiency at 28.3%

Revenue GrowthGrowth
23.3%8/10

Revenue surging 23.3% year-over-year

Areas to Watch

KEN2 concerns · Avg: 1.5/10
EPS GrowthGrowth
-95.6%2/10

Earnings declined 95.6%

Operating MarginProfitability
-1.0%1/10

Operating margin of -1.0%

SQM1 concerns · Avg: 4.0/10
P/E RatioValuation
37.4x4/10

Premium valuation, high expectations priced in

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : KEN

The strongest argument for KEN centers on Profit Margin, Return on Equity. Profitability is solid with margins at 63.8% and operating margin at -1.0%.

Bull Case : SQM

The strongest argument for SQM centers on PEG Ratio, EPS Growth, Operating Margin. Revenue growth of 23.3% demonstrates continued momentum. PEG of 0.46 suggests the stock is reasonably priced for its growth.

Bear Case : KEN

The primary concerns for KEN are EPS Growth, Operating Margin.

Bear Case : SQM

The primary concerns for SQM are P/E Ratio.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

KEN profiles as a mature stock while SQM is a growth play — different risk/reward profiles.

SQM carries more volatility with a beta of 1.04 — expect wider price swings.

SQM is growing revenue faster at 23.3% — sustainability is the question.

SQM generates stronger free cash flow (317M), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

SQM scores higher overall (66/100 vs 44/100) and 23.3% revenue growth. Both earn "Strong Buy" and "Hold" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Kenon Holdings

UTILITIES · UTILITIES - INDEPENDENT POWER PRODUCERS · USA

Kenon Holdings Ltd., is the owner, developer and operator of power generation facilities in Israel and internationally. The company is headquartered in Singapore.

Visit Website →

Sociedad Quimica y Minera de Chile SA ADR B

BASIC MATERIALS · SPECIALTY CHEMICALS · USA

Sociedad Qumica y Minera de Chile SA produces and distributes specialty plant nutrients, iodine and its derivatives, lithium and its derivatives, potassium chloride and sulfate, industrial chemicals and other products and services worldwide. The company is headquartered in Santiago, Chile.

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?