WallStSmart

Kenon Holdings (KEN)vsTeradyne Inc (TER)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Teradyne Inc generates 312% more annual revenue ($3.19B vs $774.30M). KEN leads profitability with a 63.8% profit margin vs 17.4%. TER earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 70/100 (B).

KEN

Hold

44

out of 100

Grade: D

Growth: 5.3Profit: 6.0Value: 5.0Quality: 9.0
Piotroski: 7/9Altman Z: 2.05

TER

Strong Buy

70

out of 100

Grade: B

Growth: 10.0Profit: 8.5Value: 4.7Quality: 6.8
Piotroski: 4/9
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

Intrinsic value data unavailable for KEN.

TERSignificantly Overvalued (-98.5%)

Margin of Safety

-98.5%

Fair Value

$161.93

Current Price

$323.36

$161.43 premium

UndervaluedFair: $161.93Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

KEN2 strengths · Avg: 9.5/10
Profit MarginProfitability
63.8%10/10

Keeps 64 of every $100 in revenue as profit

Return on EquityProfitability
24.1%9/10

Every $100 of equity generates 24 in profit

TER5 strengths · Avg: 9.6/10
Operating MarginProfitability
30.3%10/10

Strong operational efficiency at 30.3%

Revenue GrowthGrowth
43.9%10/10

Revenue surging 43.9% year-over-year

EPS GrowthGrowth
81.4%10/10

Earnings expanding 81.4% YoY

Market CapQuality
$50.12B9/10

Large-cap with strong market position

Debt/EquityHealth
0.129/10

Conservative balance sheet, low leverage

Areas to Watch

KEN2 concerns · Avg: 1.5/10
EPS GrowthGrowth
-95.6%2/10

Earnings declined 95.6%

Operating MarginProfitability
-1.0%1/10

Operating margin of -1.0%

TER3 concerns · Avg: 3.3/10
PEG RatioValuation
1.614/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

Price/BookValuation
18.1x4/10

Trading at 18.1x book value

P/E RatioValuation
92.5x2/10

Premium valuation, high expectations priced in

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : KEN

The strongest argument for KEN centers on Profit Margin, Return on Equity. Profitability is solid with margins at 63.8% and operating margin at -1.0%.

Bull Case : TER

The strongest argument for TER centers on Operating Margin, Revenue Growth, EPS Growth. Profitability is solid with margins at 17.4% and operating margin at 30.3%. Revenue growth of 43.9% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bear Case : KEN

The primary concerns for KEN are EPS Growth, Operating Margin.

Bear Case : TER

The primary concerns for TER are PEG Ratio, Price/Book, P/E Ratio. A P/E of 92.5x leaves little room for execution misses.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

KEN profiles as a mature stock while TER is a growth play — different risk/reward profiles.

TER carries more volatility with a beta of 1.80 — expect wider price swings.

TER is growing revenue faster at 43.9% — sustainability is the question.

TER generates stronger free cash flow (219M), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

TER scores higher overall (70/100 vs 44/100), backed by strong 17.4% margins and 43.9% revenue growth. Both earn "Strong Buy" and "Hold" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Kenon Holdings

UTILITIES · UTILITIES - INDEPENDENT POWER PRODUCERS · USA

Kenon Holdings Ltd., is the owner, developer and operator of power generation facilities in Israel and internationally. The company is headquartered in Singapore.

Visit Website →

Teradyne Inc

TECHNOLOGY · SEMICONDUCTOR EQUIPMENT & MATERIALS · USA

Teradyne, Inc. is an American automatic test equipment (ATE) designer and manufacturer based in North Reading, Massachusetts.

Visit Website →

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?