WallStSmart

Kenon Holdings (KEN)vsUber Technologies Inc (UBER)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Uber Technologies Inc generates 6057% more annual revenue ($53.69B vs $871.93M). UBER leads profitability with a 15.9% profit margin vs 7.6%. UBER trades at a lower P/E of 19.0x. UBER earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 54/100 (C-).

KEN

Hold

40

out of 100

Grade: F

Growth: 6.7Profit: 4.5Value: 3.0Quality: 7.5
Piotroski: 5/9Altman Z: 2.23

UBER

Buy

54

out of 100

Grade: C-

Growth: 5.3Profit: 7.5Value: 6.0Quality: 5.5
Piotroski: 4/9Altman Z: 1.47
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

KENSignificantly Overvalued (-39.5%)

Margin of Safety

-39.5%

Fair Value

$54.68

Current Price

$88.89

$34.21 premium

UndervaluedFair: $54.68Overvalued
UBERUndervalued (+34.2%)

Margin of Safety

+34.2%

Fair Value

$108.42

Current Price

$75.45

$32.97 discount

UndervaluedFair: $108.42Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

KEN2 strengths · Avg: 9.0/10
Revenue GrowthGrowth
43.1%10/10

Revenue surging 43.1% year-over-year

Price/BookValuation
2.9x8/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

UBER3 strengths · Avg: 9.0/10
Return on EquityProfitability
35.3%10/10

Every $100 of equity generates 35 in profit

Market CapQuality
$156.19B9/10

Large-cap with strong market position

Free Cash FlowQuality
$2.29B8/10

Generating 2.3B in free cash flow

Areas to Watch

KEN4 concerns · Avg: 2.5/10
Return on EquityProfitability
5.1%3/10

ROE of 5.1% — below average capital efficiency

Profit MarginProfitability
7.6%3/10

7.6% margin — thin

P/E RatioValuation
68.0x2/10

Premium valuation, high expectations priced in

EPS GrowthGrowth
-93.7%2/10

Earnings declined 93.7%

UBER3 concerns · Avg: 2.0/10
PEG RatioValuation
4.512/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

EPS GrowthGrowth
-84.6%2/10

Earnings declined 84.6%

Altman Z-ScoreHealth
1.472/10

Distress zone — elevated risk

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : KEN

The strongest argument for KEN centers on Revenue Growth, Price/Book. Revenue growth of 43.1% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bull Case : UBER

The strongest argument for UBER centers on Return on Equity, Market Cap, Free Cash Flow. Profitability is solid with margins at 15.9% and operating margin at 14.6%. Revenue growth of 14.5% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bear Case : KEN

The primary concerns for KEN are Return on Equity, Profit Margin, P/E Ratio. A P/E of 68.0x leaves little room for execution misses.

Bear Case : UBER

The primary concerns for UBER are PEG Ratio, EPS Growth, Altman Z-Score.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

KEN profiles as a hypergrowth stock while UBER is a mature play — different risk/reward profiles.

UBER carries more volatility with a beta of 1.16 — expect wider price swings.

KEN is growing revenue faster at 43.1% — sustainability is the question.

UBER generates stronger free cash flow (2.3B), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

UBER scores higher overall (54/100 vs 40/100), backed by strong 15.9% margins and 14.5% revenue growth. Both earn "Buy" and "Hold" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Kenon Holdings

UTILITIES · UTILITIES - INDEPENDENT POWER PRODUCERS · USA

Kenon Holdings Ltd., is the owner, developer and operator of power generation facilities in Israel and internationally. The company is headquartered in Singapore.

Visit Website →

Uber Technologies Inc

TECHNOLOGY · SOFTWARE - APPLICATION · USA

Uber Technologies, Inc., commonly known as Uber, is an American technology company. Its services include ride-hailing, food delivery (Uber Eats), package delivery, couriers, freight transportation, and, through a partnership with Lime, electric bicycle and motorized scooter rental. The company is based in San Francisco, California.

Visit Website →

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?