WallStSmart

Kenon Holdings (KEN)vsWipro Limited ADR (WIT)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Wipro Limited ADR generates 106129% more annual revenue ($926.24B vs $871.93M). WIT leads profitability with a 14.2% profit margin vs 7.6%. WIT trades at a lower P/E of 15.2x. WIT earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 59/100 (C).

KEN

Hold

40

out of 100

Grade: F

Growth: 6.7Profit: 4.5Value: 3.0Quality: 7.5
Piotroski: 5/9Altman Z: 2.23

WIT

Buy

59

out of 100

Grade: C

Growth: 4.0Profit: 7.0Value: 6.3Quality: 6.8
Piotroski: 3/9Altman Z: 3.44
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

KENSignificantly Overvalued (-39.5%)

Margin of Safety

-39.5%

Fair Value

$54.68

Current Price

$88.89

$34.21 premium

UndervaluedFair: $54.68Overvalued

Intrinsic value data unavailable for WIT.

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

KEN2 strengths · Avg: 9.0/10
Revenue GrowthGrowth
43.1%10/10

Revenue surging 43.1% year-over-year

Price/BookValuation
2.9x8/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

WIT4 strengths · Avg: 9.0/10
Free Cash FlowQuality
$26.91B10/10

Generating 26.9B in free cash flow

Altman Z-ScoreHealth
3.4410/10

Safe zone — low bankruptcy risk

P/E RatioValuation
15.2x8/10

Attractively priced relative to earnings

Price/BookValuation
2.1x8/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

Areas to Watch

KEN4 concerns · Avg: 2.5/10
Return on EquityProfitability
5.1%3/10

ROE of 5.1% — below average capital efficiency

Profit MarginProfitability
7.6%3/10

7.6% margin — thin

P/E RatioValuation
68.0x2/10

Premium valuation, high expectations priced in

EPS GrowthGrowth
-93.7%2/10

Earnings declined 93.7%

WIT2 concerns · Avg: 2.5/10
Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
3/93/10

Weak financial health signals

EPS GrowthGrowth
-1.6%2/10

Earnings declined 1.6%

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : KEN

The strongest argument for KEN centers on Revenue Growth, Price/Book. Revenue growth of 43.1% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bull Case : WIT

The strongest argument for WIT centers on Free Cash Flow, Altman Z-Score, P/E Ratio. PEG of 1.29 suggests the stock is reasonably priced for its growth.

Bear Case : KEN

The primary concerns for KEN are Return on Equity, Profit Margin, P/E Ratio. A P/E of 68.0x leaves little room for execution misses.

Bear Case : WIT

The primary concerns for WIT are Piotroski F-Score, EPS Growth.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

KEN profiles as a hypergrowth stock while WIT is a value play — different risk/reward profiles.

KEN carries more volatility with a beta of 0.38 — expect wider price swings.

KEN is growing revenue faster at 43.1% — sustainability is the question.

WIT generates stronger free cash flow (26.9B), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

WIT scores higher overall (59/100 vs 40/100). Both earn "Buy" and "Hold" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Kenon Holdings

UTILITIES · UTILITIES - INDEPENDENT POWER PRODUCERS · USA

Kenon Holdings Ltd., is the owner, developer and operator of power generation facilities in Israel and internationally. The company is headquartered in Singapore.

Visit Website →

Wipro Limited ADR

TECHNOLOGY · INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY SERVICES · USA

Wipro Limited is a global information technology (IT), consulting and business process services company. The company is headquartered in Bengaluru, India.

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?