WallStSmart

Kenon Holdings (KEN)vsWilliams Companies Inc (WMB)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Williams Companies Inc generates 1428% more annual revenue ($11.83B vs $774.30M). KEN leads profitability with a 63.8% profit margin vs 22.1%. WMB earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 67/100 (B-).

KEN

Hold

44

out of 100

Grade: D

Growth: 5.3Profit: 6.0Value: 5.0Quality: 9.0
Piotroski: 7/9Altman Z: 2.05

WMB

Strong Buy

67

out of 100

Grade: B-

Growth: 6.7Profit: 8.0Value: 9.3Quality: 3.3
Piotroski: 3/9Altman Z: 0.37
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

Intrinsic value data unavailable for KEN.

WMBUndervalued (+29.0%)

Margin of Safety

+29.0%

Fair Value

$100.15

Current Price

$73.81

$26.34 discount

UndervaluedFair: $100.15Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

KEN2 strengths · Avg: 9.5/10
Profit MarginProfitability
63.8%10/10

Keeps 64 of every $100 in revenue as profit

Return on EquityProfitability
24.1%9/10

Every $100 of equity generates 24 in profit

WMB4 strengths · Avg: 9.5/10
Operating MarginProfitability
41.2%10/10

Strong operational efficiency at 41.2%

EPS GrowthGrowth
50.8%10/10

Earnings expanding 50.8% YoY

Market CapQuality
$90.96B9/10

Large-cap with strong market position

Profit MarginProfitability
22.1%9/10

Keeps 22 of every $100 in revenue as profit

Areas to Watch

KEN2 concerns · Avg: 1.5/10
EPS GrowthGrowth
-95.6%2/10

Earnings declined 95.6%

Operating MarginProfitability
-1.0%1/10

Operating margin of -1.0%

WMB4 concerns · Avg: 3.3/10
PEG RatioValuation
2.474/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

P/E RatioValuation
34.8x4/10

Premium valuation, high expectations priced in

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
3/93/10

Weak financial health signals

Free Cash FlowQuality
$-485.00M2/10

Negative free cash flow — burning cash

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : KEN

The strongest argument for KEN centers on Profit Margin, Return on Equity. Profitability is solid with margins at 63.8% and operating margin at -1.0%.

Bull Case : WMB

The strongest argument for WMB centers on Operating Margin, EPS Growth, Market Cap. Profitability is solid with margins at 22.1% and operating margin at 41.2%.

Bear Case : KEN

The primary concerns for KEN are EPS Growth, Operating Margin.

Bear Case : WMB

The primary concerns for WMB are PEG Ratio, P/E Ratio, Piotroski F-Score.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

WMB carries more volatility with a beta of 0.65 — expect wider price swings.

WMB is growing revenue faster at 8.7% — sustainability is the question.

KEN generates stronger free cash flow (71M), providing more financial flexibility.

Monitor UTILITIES - INDEPENDENT POWER PRODUCERS industry trends, competitive dynamics, and regulatory changes.

Bottom Line

WMB scores higher overall (67/100 vs 44/100), backed by strong 22.1% margins. Both earn "Strong Buy" and "Hold" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Kenon Holdings

UTILITIES · UTILITIES - INDEPENDENT POWER PRODUCERS · USA

Kenon Holdings Ltd., is the owner, developer and operator of power generation facilities in Israel and internationally. The company is headquartered in Singapore.

Visit Website →

Williams Companies Inc

ENERGY · OIL & GAS MIDSTREAM · USA

The Williams Companies, Inc., is an American energy company based in Tulsa, Oklahoma. Its core business is natural gas processing and transportation, with additional petroleum and electricity generation assets.

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?