WallStSmart

Kenon Holdings (KEN)vsExxon Mobil Corp (XOM)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Exxon Mobil Corp generates 41732% more annual revenue ($323.90B vs $774.30M). KEN leads profitability with a 63.8% profit margin vs 8.9%. XOM earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 44/100 (D).

KEN

Hold

44

out of 100

Grade: D

Growth: 5.3Profit: 6.0Value: 5.0Quality: 9.0
Piotroski: 7/9Altman Z: 2.05

XOM

Hold

44

out of 100

Grade: D

Growth: 2.0Profit: 6.0Value: 7.3Quality: 6.5
Piotroski: 1/9Altman Z: 3.44
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

Intrinsic value data unavailable for KEN.

XOMSignificantly Overvalued (-262.4%)

Margin of Safety

-262.4%

Fair Value

$45.63

Current Price

$163.26

$117.63 premium

UndervaluedFair: $45.63Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

KEN2 strengths · Avg: 9.5/10
Profit MarginProfitability
63.8%10/10

Keeps 64 of every $100 in revenue as profit

Return on EquityProfitability
24.1%9/10

Every $100 of equity generates 24 in profit

XOM5 strengths · Avg: 9.0/10
Market CapQuality
$665.31B10/10

Mega-cap, among the largest globally

Altman Z-ScoreHealth
3.4410/10

Safe zone — low bankruptcy risk

Debt/EquityHealth
0.279/10

Conservative balance sheet, low leverage

Price/BookValuation
2.6x8/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

Free Cash FlowQuality
$5.23B8/10

Generating 5.2B in free cash flow

Areas to Watch

KEN2 concerns · Avg: 1.5/10
EPS GrowthGrowth
-95.6%2/10

Earnings declined 95.6%

Operating MarginProfitability
-1.0%1/10

Operating margin of -1.0%

XOM4 concerns · Avg: 2.8/10
PEG RatioValuation
2.024/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
1/93/10

Weak financial health signals

Revenue GrowthGrowth
-1.3%2/10

Revenue declined 1.3%

EPS GrowthGrowth
-11.0%2/10

Earnings declined 11.0%

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : KEN

The strongest argument for KEN centers on Profit Margin, Return on Equity. Profitability is solid with margins at 63.8% and operating margin at -1.0%.

Bull Case : XOM

The strongest argument for XOM centers on Market Cap, Altman Z-Score, Debt/Equity.

Bear Case : KEN

The primary concerns for KEN are EPS Growth, Operating Margin.

Bear Case : XOM

The primary concerns for XOM are PEG Ratio, Piotroski F-Score, Revenue Growth.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

KEN profiles as a mature stock while XOM is a value play — different risk/reward profiles.

KEN carries more volatility with a beta of 0.49 — expect wider price swings.

KEN is growing revenue faster at 8.3% — sustainability is the question.

XOM generates stronger free cash flow (5.2B), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

KEN scores higher overall (44/100 vs 44/100), backed by strong 63.8% margins. Both earn "Hold" and "Hold" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Kenon Holdings

UTILITIES · UTILITIES - INDEPENDENT POWER PRODUCERS · USA

Kenon Holdings Ltd., is the owner, developer and operator of power generation facilities in Israel and internationally. The company is headquartered in Singapore.

Visit Website →

Exxon Mobil Corp

ENERGY · OIL & GAS INTEGRATED · USA

Exxon Mobil Corporation, stylized as ExxonMobil, is an American multinational oil and gas corporation headquartered in Irving, Texas. It is the largest direct descendant of John D. Rockefeller's Standard Oil, and was formed on November 30, 1999 by the merger of Exxon (formerly the Standard Oil Company of New Jersey) and Mobil (formerly the Standard Oil Company of New York). ExxonMobil's primary brands are Exxon, Mobil, Esso, and ExxonMobil Chemical. ExxonMobil is incorporated in New Jersey.

Visit Website →

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?