WallStSmart

Kimberly-Clark Corporation (KMB)vsRush Enterprises A Inc (RUSHA)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Kimberly-Clark Corporation generates 128% more annual revenue ($16.56B vs $7.27B). KMB leads profitability with a 12.8% profit margin vs 3.6%. KMB appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 2.00. KMB earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 61/100 (C+).

KMB

Buy

61

out of 100

Grade: C+

Growth: 4.7Profit: 8.0Value: 4.0Quality: 4.0
Piotroski: 3/9Altman Z: 2.19

RUSHA

Hold

47

out of 100

Grade: D+

Growth: 4.0Profit: 5.0Value: 6.0Quality: 6.3
Piotroski: 4/9Altman Z: 3.13
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

KMBSignificantly Overvalued (-18.9%)

Margin of Safety

-18.9%

Fair Value

$90.52

Current Price

$98.31

$7.79 premium

UndervaluedFair: $90.52Overvalued
RUSHAUndervalued (+55.8%)

Margin of Safety

+55.8%

Fair Value

$164.81

Current Price

$72.31

$92.50 discount

UndervaluedFair: $164.81Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

KMB1 strengths · Avg: 10.0/10
Return on EquityProfitability
111.7%10/10

Every $100 of equity generates 112 in profit

RUSHA2 strengths · Avg: 9.0/10
Altman Z-ScoreHealth
3.1310/10

Safe zone — low bankruptcy risk

Price/BookValuation
2.5x8/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

Areas to Watch

KMB4 concerns · Avg: 3.8/10
PEG RatioValuation
2.004/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

Price/BookValuation
18.2x4/10

Trading at 18.2x book value

Revenue GrowthGrowth
2.7%4/10

2.7% revenue growth

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
3/93/10

Weak financial health signals

RUSHA4 concerns · Avg: 2.5/10
Profit MarginProfitability
3.6%3/10

3.6% margin — thin

Operating MarginProfitability
4.9%3/10

Operating margin of 4.9%

PEG RatioValuation
3.162/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

Revenue GrowthGrowth
-9.0%2/10

Revenue declined 9.0%

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : KMB

The strongest argument for KMB centers on Return on Equity.

Bull Case : RUSHA

The strongest argument for RUSHA centers on Altman Z-Score, Price/Book.

Bear Case : KMB

The primary concerns for KMB are PEG Ratio, Price/Book, Revenue Growth. Debt-to-equity of 4.77 is elevated, increasing financial risk.

Bear Case : RUSHA

The primary concerns for RUSHA are Profit Margin, Operating Margin, PEG Ratio. Thin 3.6% margins leave little buffer for downturns.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

RUSHA carries more volatility with a beta of 0.93 — expect wider price swings.

KMB is growing revenue faster at 2.7% — sustainability is the question.

KMB generates stronger free cash flow (321M), providing more financial flexibility.

Monitor HOUSEHOLD & PERSONAL PRODUCTS industry trends, competitive dynamics, and regulatory changes.

Bottom Line

KMB scores higher overall (61/100 vs 47/100). RUSHA offers better value entry with a 55.8% margin of safety. Both earn "Buy" and "Hold" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Kimberly-Clark Corporation

CONSUMER DEFENSIVE · HOUSEHOLD & PERSONAL PRODUCTS · USA

Kimberly-Clark Corporation is an American multinational personal care corporation that produces mostly paper-based consumer products. The company manufactures sanitary paper products and surgical & medical instruments. Kimberly-Clark brand name products include Kleenex facial tissue, Kotex feminine hygiene products, Cottonelle, Scott and Andrex toilet paper, Wypall utility wipes, KimWipes scientific cleaning wipes and Huggies disposable diapers and baby wipes.

Visit Website →

Rush Enterprises A Inc

CONSUMER CYCLICAL · AUTO & TRUCK DEALERSHIPS · USA

Rush Enterprises, Inc. is an integrated retailer of commercial vehicles and related services in the United States. The company is headquartered in New Braunfels, Texas.

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?