WallStSmart

Lithia Motors Inc (LAD)vsRush Enterprises A Inc (RUSHA)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Lithia Motors Inc generates 424% more annual revenue ($37.94B vs $7.24B). RUSHA leads profitability with a 3.7% profit margin vs 1.9%. LAD appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 0.80. LAD earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 61/100 (C+).

LAD

Buy

61

out of 100

Grade: C+

Growth: 6.7Profit: 5.0Value: 7.3Quality: 4.0
Piotroski: 2/9Altman Z: 2.38

RUSHA

Hold

46

out of 100

Grade: D+

Growth: 3.3Profit: 5.5Value: 4.3Quality: 6.0
Piotroski: 3/9Altman Z: 3.34
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

LADUndervalued (+12.2%)

Margin of Safety

+12.2%

Fair Value

$364.72

Current Price

$370.99

$6.27 discount

UndervaluedFair: $364.72Overvalued

Intrinsic value data unavailable for RUSHA.

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

LAD3 strengths · Avg: 8.7/10
Price/BookValuation
1.3x10/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

PEG RatioValuation
0.808/10

Growing faster than its price suggests

P/E RatioValuation
12.8x8/10

Attractively priced relative to earnings

RUSHA2 strengths · Avg: 9.0/10
Altman Z-ScoreHealth
3.3410/10

Safe zone — low bankruptcy risk

Price/BookValuation
2.8x8/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

Areas to Watch

LAD4 concerns · Avg: 3.3/10
Revenue GrowthGrowth
2.2%4/10

2.2% revenue growth

Profit MarginProfitability
1.9%3/10

1.9% margin — thin

Operating MarginProfitability
4.6%3/10

Operating margin of 4.6%

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
2/93/10

Weak financial health signals

RUSHA4 concerns · Avg: 3.0/10
EPS GrowthGrowth
1.1%4/10

1.1% earnings growth

Profit MarginProfitability
3.7%3/10

3.7% margin — thin

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
3/93/10

Weak financial health signals

PEG RatioValuation
3.162/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : LAD

The strongest argument for LAD centers on Price/Book, PEG Ratio, P/E Ratio. PEG of 0.80 suggests the stock is reasonably priced for its growth.

Bull Case : RUSHA

The strongest argument for RUSHA centers on Altman Z-Score, Price/Book.

Bear Case : LAD

The primary concerns for LAD are Revenue Growth, Profit Margin, Operating Margin. Debt-to-equity of 2.53 is elevated, increasing financial risk. Thin 1.9% margins leave little buffer for downturns.

Bear Case : RUSHA

The primary concerns for RUSHA are EPS Growth, Profit Margin, Piotroski F-Score. Thin 3.7% margins leave little buffer for downturns.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

LAD carries more volatility with a beta of 1.26 — expect wider price swings.

LAD is growing revenue faster at 2.2% — sustainability is the question.

RUSHA generates stronger free cash flow (21M), providing more financial flexibility.

Monitor AUTO & TRUCK DEALERSHIPS industry trends, competitive dynamics, and regulatory changes.

Bottom Line

LAD scores higher overall (61/100 vs 46/100). Both earn "Buy" and "Hold" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Lithia Motors Inc

CONSUMER CYCLICAL · AUTO & TRUCK DEALERSHIPS · USA

Lithia Motors, Inc. is an automobile retailer in the United States. The company is headquartered in Medford, Oregon.

Rush Enterprises A Inc

CONSUMER CYCLICAL · AUTO & TRUCK DEALERSHIPS · USA

Rush Enterprises, Inc. is an integrated retailer of commercial vehicles and related services in the United States. The company is headquartered in New Braunfels, Texas.

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?