WallStSmart

Li Auto Inc (LI)vsSea Ltd (SE)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Li Auto Inc generates 278% more annual revenue ($104.79B vs $27.72B). SE leads profitability with a 5.9% profit margin vs -4.4%. SE appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 1.04. SE earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 56/100 (C).

LI

Avoid

33

out of 100

Grade: F

Growth: 4.7Profit: 2.0Value: 5.7Quality: 6.0
Piotroski: 2/9Altman Z: 1.78

SE

Buy

56

out of 100

Grade: C

Growth: 8.7Profit: 5.5Value: 6.7Quality: 6.5
Piotroski: 6/9Altman Z: 1.53
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

LIUndervalued (+76.6%)

Margin of Safety

+76.6%

Fair Value

$82.13

Current Price

$11.81

$70.32 discount

UndervaluedFair: $82.13Overvalued
SEUndervalued (+56.1%)

Margin of Safety

+56.1%

Fair Value

$260.75

Current Price

$106.24

$154.51 discount

UndervaluedFair: $260.75Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

LI1 strengths · Avg: 10.0/10
Price/BookValuation
1.2x10/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

SE3 strengths · Avg: 9.0/10
Revenue GrowthGrowth
48.1%10/10

Revenue surging 48.1% year-over-year

Market CapQuality
$65.07B9/10

Large-cap with strong market position

Free Cash FlowQuality
$1.15B8/10

Generating 1.1B in free cash flow

Areas to Watch

LI4 concerns · Avg: 2.8/10
Altman Z-ScoreHealth
1.784/10

Distress zone — elevated risk

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
2/93/10

Weak financial health signals

PEG RatioValuation
4.582/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

Return on EquityProfitability
-7.0%2/10

ROE of -7.0% — below average capital efficiency

SE3 concerns · Avg: 3.0/10
Altman Z-ScoreHealth
1.534/10

Distress zone — elevated risk

Profit MarginProfitability
5.9%3/10

5.9% margin — thin

P/E RatioValuation
41.5x2/10

Premium valuation, high expectations priced in

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : LI

The strongest argument for LI centers on Price/Book.

Bull Case : SE

The strongest argument for SE centers on Revenue Growth, Market Cap, Free Cash Flow. Revenue growth of 48.1% demonstrates continued momentum. PEG of 1.04 suggests the stock is reasonably priced for its growth.

Bear Case : LI

The primary concerns for LI are Altman Z-Score, Piotroski F-Score, PEG Ratio.

Bear Case : SE

The primary concerns for SE are Altman Z-Score, Profit Margin, P/E Ratio. A P/E of 41.5x leaves little room for execution misses.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

LI profiles as a turnaround stock while SE is a hypergrowth play — different risk/reward profiles.

SE carries more volatility with a beta of 1.52 — expect wider price swings.

SE is growing revenue faster at 48.1% — sustainability is the question.

SE generates stronger free cash flow (1.1B), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

SE scores higher overall (56/100 vs 33/100) and 48.1% revenue growth. LI offers better value entry with a 76.6% margin of safety. Both earn "Buy" and "Avoid" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Li Auto Inc

CONSUMER CYCLICAL · AUTO MANUFACTURERS · China

Li Auto Inc. designs, develops, manufactures and sells smart electric sport utility vehicles (SUVs) in China. The company is headquartered in Beijing, China.

Sea Ltd

CONSUMER CYCLICAL · INTERNET RETAIL · USA

Sea Limited is engaged in the digital entertainment, e-commerce and digital financial services businesses in Southeast Asia, Latin America, the rest of Asia and internationally. The company is headquartered in Singapore.

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?