WallStSmart

Li Auto Inc (LI)vsSea Ltd (SE)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Li Auto Inc generates 334% more annual revenue ($109.37B vs $25.19B). SE leads profitability with a 6.4% profit margin vs -1.7%. LI appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 0.83. SE earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 52/100 (C-).

LI

Hold

41

out of 100

Grade: D

Growth: 4.7Profit: 2.0Value: 7.7Quality: 6.5
Piotroski: 2/9Altman Z: 1.78

SE

Buy

52

out of 100

Grade: C-

Growth: 8.0Profit: 5.5Value: 6.0Quality: 7.5
Piotroski: 6/9Altman Z: 1.53
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

LIUndervalued (+77.9%)

Margin of Safety

+77.9%

Fair Value

$86.92

Current Price

$13.80

$73.12 discount

UndervaluedFair: $86.92Overvalued
SEUndervalued (+52.3%)

Margin of Safety

+52.3%

Fair Value

$240.26

Current Price

$108.37

$131.89 discount

UndervaluedFair: $240.26Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

LI3 strengths · Avg: 9.0/10
Price/BookValuation
1.4x10/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

Debt/EquityHealth
0.259/10

Conservative balance sheet, low leverage

PEG RatioValuation
0.838/10

Growing faster than its price suggests

SE3 strengths · Avg: 9.3/10
Revenue GrowthGrowth
46.6%10/10

Revenue surging 46.6% year-over-year

Market CapQuality
$66.83B9/10

Large-cap with strong market position

Debt/EquityHealth
0.289/10

Conservative balance sheet, low leverage

Areas to Watch

LI4 concerns · Avg: 2.8/10
Altman Z-ScoreHealth
1.784/10

Distress zone — elevated risk

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
2/93/10

Weak financial health signals

Return on EquityProfitability
-2.6%2/10

ROE of -2.6% — below average capital efficiency

Revenue GrowthGrowth
-11.4%2/10

Revenue declined 11.4%

SE4 concerns · Avg: 3.8/10
PEG RatioValuation
1.514/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

EPS GrowthGrowth
3.1%4/10

3.1% earnings growth

Altman Z-ScoreHealth
1.534/10

Distress zone — elevated risk

Profit MarginProfitability
6.4%3/10

6.4% margin — thin

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : LI

The strongest argument for LI centers on Price/Book, Debt/Equity, PEG Ratio. PEG of 0.83 suggests the stock is reasonably priced for its growth.

Bull Case : SE

The strongest argument for SE centers on Revenue Growth, Market Cap, Debt/Equity. Revenue growth of 46.6% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bear Case : LI

The primary concerns for LI are Altman Z-Score, Piotroski F-Score, Return on Equity.

Bear Case : SE

The primary concerns for SE are PEG Ratio, EPS Growth, Altman Z-Score. A P/E of 41.5x leaves little room for execution misses.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

LI profiles as a turnaround stock while SE is a hypergrowth play — different risk/reward profiles.

SE carries more volatility with a beta of 1.55 — expect wider price swings.

SE is growing revenue faster at 46.6% — sustainability is the question.

SE generates stronger free cash flow (919M), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

SE scores higher overall (52/100 vs 41/100) and 46.6% revenue growth. LI offers better value entry with a 77.9% margin of safety. Both earn "Buy" and "Hold" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Li Auto Inc

CONSUMER CYCLICAL · AUTO MANUFACTURERS · China

Li Auto Inc. designs, develops, manufactures and sells smart electric sport utility vehicles (SUVs) in China. The company is headquartered in Beijing, China.

Sea Ltd

CONSUMER CYCLICAL · INTERNET RETAIL · USA

Sea Limited is engaged in the digital entertainment, e-commerce and digital financial services businesses in Southeast Asia, Latin America, the rest of Asia and internationally. The company is headquartered in Singapore.

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?