WallStSmart

Live Ventures Inc (LIVE)vsVF Corporation (VFC)

VS
⚡

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

VF Corporation generates 2091% more annual revenue ($9.51B vs $434.25M). VFC leads profitability with a 2.9% profit margin vs -0.6%. VFC earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 62/100 (C+).

LIVE

Avoid

30

out of 100

Grade: F

Growth: 4.0Profit: 3.5Value: 6.7Quality: 5.0
Piotroski: 5/9Altman Z: 2.02

VFC

Buy

62

out of 100

Grade: C+

Growth: 4.7Profit: 4.5Value: 8.7Quality: 4.0
Piotroski: 5/9Altman Z: 1.46
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

LIVEUndervalued (+85.8%)

Margin of Safety

+85.8%

Fair Value

$137.54

Current Price

$7.77

$129.77 discount

UndervaluedFair: $137.54Overvalued
VFCUndervalued (+68.4%)

Margin of Safety

+68.4%

Fair Value

$65.94

Current Price

$13.69

$52.25 discount

UndervaluedFair: $65.94Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

LIVE1 strengths · Avg: 10.0/10
Price/BookValuation
0.3x10/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

VFC3 strengths · Avg: 10.0/10
PEG RatioValuation
0.3210/10

Growing faster than its price suggests

Price/BookValuation
1.4x10/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

EPS GrowthGrowth
78.1%10/10

Earnings expanding 78.1% YoY

Areas to Watch

LIVE4 concerns · Avg: 2.8/10
Market CapQuality
$23.96M3/10

Smaller company, higher risk/reward

Return on EquityProfitability
4.2%3/10

ROE of 4.2% — below average capital efficiency

Operating MarginProfitability
4.8%3/10

Operating margin of 4.8%

Revenue GrowthGrowth
-3.2%2/10

Revenue declined 3.2%

VFC4 concerns · Avg: 2.3/10
Profit MarginProfitability
2.9%3/10

2.9% margin — thin

Revenue GrowthGrowth
-5.2%2/10

Revenue declined 5.2%

Free Cash FlowQuality
$-115.76M2/10

Negative free cash flow — burning cash

Altman Z-ScoreHealth
1.462/10

Distress zone — elevated risk

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : LIVE

The strongest argument for LIVE centers on Price/Book.

Bull Case : VFC

The strongest argument for VFC centers on PEG Ratio, Price/Book, EPS Growth. PEG of 0.32 suggests the stock is reasonably priced for its growth.

Bear Case : LIVE

The primary concerns for LIVE are Market Cap, Return on Equity, Operating Margin. Debt-to-equity of 2.44 is elevated, increasing financial risk.

Bear Case : VFC

The primary concerns for VFC are Profit Margin, Revenue Growth, Free Cash Flow. Debt-to-equity of 2.81 is elevated, increasing financial risk. Thin 2.9% margins leave little buffer for downturns.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

LIVE profiles as a turnaround stock while VFC is a value play — different risk/reward profiles.

VFC carries more volatility with a beta of 1.60 — expect wider price swings.

LIVE is growing revenue faster at -3.2% — sustainability is the question.

LIVE generates stronger free cash flow (5M), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

VFC scores higher overall (62/100 vs 30/100). LIVE offers better value entry with a 85.8% margin of safety. Both earn "Buy" and "Avoid" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Live Ventures Inc

CONSUMER CYCLICAL · HOME IMPROVEMENT RETAIL · USA

Live Ventures Incorporated is engaged in flooring manufacturing, steel fabrication and retail businesses in the United States. The company is headquartered in Las Vegas, Nevada.

Visit Website →

VF Corporation

CONSUMER CYCLICAL · APPAREL MANUFACTURING · USA

VF Corporation is an American worldwide apparel and footwear company founded in 1899 and headquartered in Denver, Colorado. The company's more than 30 brands are organized into three categories: Outdoor, Active and Work.

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?