WallStSmart

Lululemon Athletica Inc. (LULU)vsSea Ltd (SE)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Sea Ltd generates 107% more annual revenue ($22.94B vs $11.10B). LULU leads profitability with a 14.2% profit margin vs 6.9%. SE appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 0.59. SE earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 70/100 (B-).

LULU

Strong Buy

65

out of 100

Grade: B-

Growth: 4.7Profit: 8.5Value: 9.3Quality: 7.5
Piotroski: 2/9Altman Z: 4.32

SE

Strong Buy

70

out of 100

Grade: B-

Growth: 10.0Profit: 6.0Value: 7.3Quality: 5.5
Piotroski: 6/9
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

LULUUndervalued (+71.3%)

Margin of Safety

+71.3%

Fair Value

$613.55

Current Price

$137.70

$475.85 discount

UndervaluedFair: $613.55Overvalued
SEUndervalued (+53.2%)

Margin of Safety

+53.2%

Fair Value

$244.86

Current Price

$84.88

$159.98 discount

UndervaluedFair: $244.86Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

LULU5 strengths · Avg: 9.2/10
P/E RatioValuation
10.4x10/10

Attractively priced relative to earnings

Return on EquityProfitability
34.0%10/10

Every $100 of equity generates 34 in profit

Altman Z-ScoreHealth
4.3210/10

Safe zone — low bankruptcy risk

PEG RatioValuation
0.688/10

Growing faster than its price suggests

Operating MarginProfitability
22.3%8/10

Strong operational efficiency at 22.3%

SE4 strengths · Avg: 9.3/10
Revenue GrowthGrowth
38.4%10/10

Revenue surging 38.4% year-over-year

EPS GrowthGrowth
58.2%10/10

Earnings expanding 58.2% YoY

Market CapQuality
$51.99B9/10

Large-cap with strong market position

PEG RatioValuation
0.598/10

Growing faster than its price suggests

Areas to Watch

LULU3 concerns · Avg: 3.0/10
Revenue GrowthGrowth
0.8%4/10

0.8% revenue growth

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
2/93/10

Weak financial health signals

EPS GrowthGrowth
-18.5%2/10

Earnings declined 18.5%

SE3 concerns · Avg: 3.0/10
P/E RatioValuation
33.7x4/10

Premium valuation, high expectations priced in

Profit MarginProfitability
6.9%3/10

6.9% margin — thin

Free Cash FlowQuality
$02/10

Negative free cash flow — burning cash

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : LULU

The strongest argument for LULU centers on P/E Ratio, Return on Equity, Altman Z-Score. PEG of 0.68 suggests the stock is reasonably priced for its growth.

Bull Case : SE

The strongest argument for SE centers on Revenue Growth, EPS Growth, Market Cap. Revenue growth of 38.4% demonstrates continued momentum. PEG of 0.59 suggests the stock is reasonably priced for its growth.

Bear Case : LULU

The primary concerns for LULU are Revenue Growth, Piotroski F-Score, EPS Growth.

Bear Case : SE

The primary concerns for SE are P/E Ratio, Profit Margin, Free Cash Flow.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

LULU profiles as a value stock while SE is a hypergrowth play — different risk/reward profiles.

SE carries more volatility with a beta of 1.70 — expect wider price swings.

SE is growing revenue faster at 38.4% — sustainability is the question.

Monitor APPAREL RETAIL industry trends, competitive dynamics, and regulatory changes.

Bottom Line

SE scores higher overall (70/100 vs 65/100) and 38.4% revenue growth. LULU offers better value entry with a 71.3% margin of safety. Both earn "Strong Buy" and "Strong Buy" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Lululemon Athletica Inc.

CONSUMER CYCLICAL · APPAREL RETAIL · USA

lululemon athletica inc. The company is headquartered in Vancouver, Canada.

Visit Website →

Sea Ltd

CONSUMER CYCLICAL · INTERNET RETAIL · USA

Sea Limited is engaged in the digital entertainment, e-commerce and digital financial services businesses in Southeast Asia, Latin America, the rest of Asia and internationally. The company is headquartered in Singapore.

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?