WallStSmart

Lululemon Athletica Inc. (LULU)vsSea Ltd (SE)

VS
⚡

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Sea Ltd generates 150% more annual revenue ($27.72B vs $11.09B). LULU leads profitability with a 12.8% profit margin vs 5.9%. SE appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 0.99. SE earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 60/100 (C+).

LULU

Buy

60

out of 100

Grade: C

Growth: 4.0Profit: 7.5Value: 8.7Quality: 7.5
Piotroski: 3/9Altman Z: 4.12

SE

Buy

60

out of 100

Grade: C+

Growth: 8.7Profit: 5.5Value: 7.3Quality: 6.5
Piotroski: 6/9Altman Z: 1.53
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

LULUUndervalued (+70.2%)

Margin of Safety

+70.2%

Fair Value

$589.81

Current Price

$105.22

$484.59 discount

UndervaluedFair: $589.81Overvalued
SEUndervalued (+55.2%)

Margin of Safety

+55.2%

Fair Value

$255.67

Current Price

$75.18

$180.49 discount

UndervaluedFair: $255.67Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

LULU4 strengths · Avg: 9.3/10
P/E RatioValuation
8.0x10/10

Attractively priced relative to earnings

Altman Z-ScoreHealth
4.1210/10

Safe zone — low bankruptcy risk

Return on EquityProfitability
29.6%9/10

Every $100 of equity generates 30 in profit

Price/BookValuation
2.5x8/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

SE4 strengths · Avg: 8.8/10
Revenue GrowthGrowth
48.1%10/10

Revenue surging 48.1% year-over-year

Market CapQuality
$57.43B9/10

Large-cap with strong market position

PEG RatioValuation
0.998/10

Growing faster than its price suggests

Free Cash FlowQuality
$1.15B8/10

Generating 1.1B in free cash flow

Areas to Watch

LULU3 concerns · Avg: 2.3/10
Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
3/93/10

Weak financial health signals

Revenue GrowthGrowth
-4.3%2/10

Revenue declined 4.3%

EPS GrowthGrowth
-5.9%2/10

Earnings declined 5.9%

SE3 concerns · Avg: 3.7/10
P/E RatioValuation
36.2x4/10

Premium valuation, high expectations priced in

Altman Z-ScoreHealth
1.534/10

Distress zone — elevated risk

Profit MarginProfitability
5.9%3/10

5.9% margin — thin

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : LULU

The strongest argument for LULU centers on P/E Ratio, Altman Z-Score, Return on Equity. PEG of 1.13 suggests the stock is reasonably priced for its growth.

Bull Case : SE

The strongest argument for SE centers on Revenue Growth, Market Cap, PEG Ratio. Revenue growth of 48.1% demonstrates continued momentum. PEG of 0.99 suggests the stock is reasonably priced for its growth.

Bear Case : LULU

The primary concerns for LULU are Piotroski F-Score, Revenue Growth, EPS Growth.

Bear Case : SE

The primary concerns for SE are P/E Ratio, Altman Z-Score, Profit Margin.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

LULU profiles as a declining stock while SE is a hypergrowth play — different risk/reward profiles.

SE carries more volatility with a beta of 1.55 — expect wider price swings.

SE is growing revenue faster at 48.1% — sustainability is the question.

SE generates stronger free cash flow (1.1B), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

LULU scores higher overall (60/100 vs 60/100). SE offers better value entry with a 55.2% margin of safety. Both earn "Buy" and "Buy" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Lululemon Athletica Inc.

CONSUMER CYCLICAL · APPAREL RETAIL · USA

lululemon athletica inc. The company is headquartered in Vancouver, Canada.

Visit Website →

Sea Ltd

CONSUMER CYCLICAL · INTERNET RETAIL · USA

Sea Limited is engaged in the digital entertainment, e-commerce and digital financial services businesses in Southeast Asia, Latin America, the rest of Asia and internationally. The company is headquartered in Singapore.

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?