WallStSmart

LYFT Inc (LYFT)vsSonos Inc (SONO)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

LYFT Inc generates 346% more annual revenue ($6.52B vs $1.46B). LYFT leads profitability with a 43.8% profit margin vs 1.6%. LYFT trades at a lower P/E of 2.0x. LYFT earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 81/100 (A-).

LYFT

Exceptional Buy

81

out of 100

Grade: A-

Growth: 8.0Profit: 6.0Value: 10.0Quality: 4.0
Piotroski: 2/9Altman Z: -0.33

SONO

Hold

45

out of 100

Grade: D+

Growth: 6.0Profit: 4.0Value: 3.0Quality: 7.0
Piotroski: 3/9Altman Z: 2.04
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

LYFTUndervalued (+54.5%)

Margin of Safety

+54.5%

Fair Value

$29.25

Current Price

$13.65

$15.60 discount

UndervaluedFair: $29.25Overvalued
SONOSignificantly Overvalued (-34.6%)

Margin of Safety

-34.6%

Fair Value

$12.26

Current Price

$15.08

$2.82 premium

UndervaluedFair: $12.26Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

LYFT6 strengths · Avg: 9.7/10
PEG RatioValuation
0.1510/10

Growing faster than its price suggests

P/E RatioValuation
2.0x10/10

Attractively priced relative to earnings

Return on EquityProfitability
94.4%10/10

Every $100 of equity generates 94 in profit

Profit MarginProfitability
43.8%10/10

Keeps 44 of every $100 in revenue as profit

EPS GrowthGrowth
488.9%10/10

Earnings expanding 488.9% YoY

Price/BookValuation
1.7x8/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

SONO2 strengths · Avg: 9.5/10
EPS GrowthGrowth
87.5%10/10

Earnings expanding 87.5% YoY

Debt/EquityHealth
0.159/10

Conservative balance sheet, low leverage

Areas to Watch

LYFT3 concerns · Avg: 2.0/10
Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
2/93/10

Weak financial health signals

Altman Z-ScoreHealth
-0.332/10

Distress zone — elevated risk

Operating MarginProfitability
-0.3%1/10

Operating margin of -0.3%

SONO4 concerns · Avg: 3.0/10
Market CapQuality
$1.83B3/10

Smaller company, higher risk/reward

Return on EquityProfitability
6.2%3/10

ROE of 6.2% — below average capital efficiency

Profit MarginProfitability
1.6%3/10

1.6% margin — thin

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
3/93/10

Weak financial health signals

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : LYFT

The strongest argument for LYFT centers on PEG Ratio, P/E Ratio, Return on Equity. Profitability is solid with margins at 43.8% and operating margin at -0.3%. Revenue growth of 13.8% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bull Case : SONO

The strongest argument for SONO centers on EPS Growth, Debt/Equity.

Bear Case : LYFT

The primary concerns for LYFT are Piotroski F-Score, Altman Z-Score, Operating Margin.

Bear Case : SONO

The primary concerns for SONO are Market Cap, Return on Equity, Profit Margin. A P/E of 90.3x leaves little room for execution misses. Thin 1.6% margins leave little buffer for downturns.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

LYFT profiles as a mature stock while SONO is a value play — different risk/reward profiles.

SONO carries more volatility with a beta of 1.94 — expect wider price swings.

LYFT is growing revenue faster at 13.8% — sustainability is the question.

LYFT generates stronger free cash flow (287M), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

LYFT scores higher overall (81/100 vs 45/100), backed by strong 43.8% margins and 13.8% revenue growth. Both earn "Exceptional Buy" and "Hold" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

LYFT Inc

TECHNOLOGY · SOFTWARE - APPLICATION · USA

Lyft, Inc. operates a peer-to-peer marketplace for on-demand ridesharing in the United States and Canada. The company is headquartered in San Francisco, California.

Sonos Inc

TECHNOLOGY · CONSUMER ELECTRONICS · USA

Sonos, Inc. designs, develops, manufactures, and sells multi-room audio products in the Americas, Europe, the Middle East, Africa, and Asia Pacific. The company is headquartered in Santa Barbara, California.

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?