WallStSmart

Medpace Holdings Inc (MEDP)vsWaters Corporation (WAT)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Waters Corporation generates 41% more annual revenue ($3.77B vs $2.68B). MEDP leads profitability with a 17.2% profit margin vs 11.9%. WAT appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 1.60. MEDP earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 66/100 (B-).

MEDP

Strong Buy

66

out of 100

Grade: B-

Growth: 8.7Profit: 9.0Value: 3.3Quality: 6.0
Piotroski: 4/9Altman Z: 1.83

WAT

Buy

50

out of 100

Grade: C-

Growth: 5.3Profit: 5.0Value: 3.3Quality: 7.0
Piotroski: 2/9Altman Z: 4.85
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

MEDPSignificantly Overvalued (-50.2%)

Margin of Safety

-50.2%

Fair Value

$282.31

Current Price

$454.25

$171.94 premium

UndervaluedFair: $282.31Overvalued
WATSignificantly Overvalued (-84.6%)

Margin of Safety

-84.6%

Fair Value

$178.29

Current Price

$365.36

$187.07 premium

UndervaluedFair: $178.29Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

MEDP4 strengths · Avg: 8.8/10
Return on EquityProfitability
77.0%10/10

Every $100 of equity generates 77 in profit

Debt/EquityHealth
0.249/10

Conservative balance sheet, low leverage

Operating MarginProfitability
20.0%8/10

Strong operational efficiency at 20.0%

Revenue GrowthGrowth
26.5%8/10

Revenue surging 26.5% year-over-year

WAT2 strengths · Avg: 10.0/10
Revenue GrowthGrowth
91.4%10/10

Revenue surging 91.4% year-over-year

Altman Z-ScoreHealth
4.8510/10

Safe zone — low bankruptcy risk

Areas to Watch

MEDP4 concerns · Avg: 3.0/10
P/E RatioValuation
29.4x4/10

Moderate valuation

Altman Z-ScoreHealth
1.834/10

Grey zone — moderate risk

PEG RatioValuation
2.872/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

Price/BookValuation
21.7x2/10

Trading at 21.7x book value

WAT4 concerns · Avg: 3.5/10
PEG RatioValuation
1.604/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

Price/BookValuation
8.5x4/10

Trading at 8.5x book value

Return on EquityProfitability
2.9%3/10

ROE of 2.9% — below average capital efficiency

Operating MarginProfitability
2.8%3/10

Operating margin of 2.8%

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : MEDP

The strongest argument for MEDP centers on Return on Equity, Debt/Equity, Operating Margin. Profitability is solid with margins at 17.2% and operating margin at 20.0%. Revenue growth of 26.5% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bull Case : WAT

The strongest argument for WAT centers on Revenue Growth, Altman Z-Score. Revenue growth of 91.4% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bear Case : MEDP

The primary concerns for MEDP are P/E Ratio, Altman Z-Score, PEG Ratio.

Bear Case : WAT

The primary concerns for WAT are PEG Ratio, Price/Book, Return on Equity. A P/E of 45.2x leaves little room for execution misses.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

WAT carries more volatility with a beta of 1.20 — expect wider price swings.

WAT is growing revenue faster at 91.4% — sustainability is the question.

MEDP generates stronger free cash flow (145M), providing more financial flexibility.

Monitor DIAGNOSTICS & RESEARCH industry trends, competitive dynamics, and regulatory changes.

Bottom Line

MEDP scores higher overall (66/100 vs 50/100), backed by strong 17.2% margins and 26.5% revenue growth. Both earn "Strong Buy" and "Buy" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Medpace Holdings Inc

HEALTHCARE · DIAGNOSTICS & RESEARCH · USA

Medpace Holdings, Inc. provides clinical research-based drug and medical device development services in North America, Europe, and Asia. The company is headquartered in Cincinnati, Ohio.

Waters Corporation

HEALTHCARE · DIAGNOSTICS & RESEARCH · USA

Waters Corporation is a publicly traded Analytical Laboratory instrument and software company headquartered in Milford, Massachusetts.

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?