Meta Platforms Inc. (META)vsZiff Davis Inc (ZD)
META
Meta Platforms Inc.
$611.91
-8.55%
COMMUNICATION SERVICES · Cap: $1.55T
ZD
Ziff Davis Inc
$45.76
-2.14%
COMMUNICATION SERVICES · Cap: $1.77B
Smart Verdict
WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison
Meta Platforms Inc. generates 13748% more annual revenue ($200.97B vs $1.45B). META leads profitability with a 30.1% profit margin vs 3.3%. META appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 1.00. META earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 75/100 (B).
META
Strong Buy75
out of 100
Grade: B
ZD
Hold48
out of 100
Grade: D+
Intrinsic Value Comparison
Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula
Margin of Safety
+30.1%
Fair Value
$875.05
Current Price
$611.91
$263.14 discount
Margin of Safety
+77.5%
Fair Value
$139.51
Current Price
$45.76
$93.75 discount
Key Strengths & Concerns
Side-by-side fundamental analysis
Key Strengths
Mega-cap, among the largest globally
Every $100 of equity generates 30 in profit
Keeps 30 of every $100 in revenue as profit
Strong operational efficiency at 41.3%
Generating 14.8B in free cash flow
Growing faster than its price suggests
Reasonable price relative to book value
Strong operational efficiency at 21.2%
Areas to Watch
Weak financial health signals
Expensive relative to growth rate
Distress zone — elevated risk
Smaller company, higher risk/reward
ROE of 2.7% — below average capital efficiency
Comparative Analysis Report
WallStSmart ResearchBull Case : META
The strongest argument for META centers on Market Cap, Return on Equity, Profit Margin. Profitability is solid with margins at 30.1% and operating margin at 41.3%. Revenue growth of 23.8% demonstrates continued momentum.
Bull Case : ZD
The strongest argument for ZD centers on Price/Book, Operating Margin.
Bear Case : META
The primary concerns for META are Piotroski F-Score.
Bear Case : ZD
The primary concerns for ZD are PEG Ratio, Altman Z-Score, Market Cap. A P/E of 40.7x leaves little room for execution misses. Thin 3.3% margins leave little buffer for downturns.
Key Dynamics to Monitor
META profiles as a growth stock while ZD is a value play — different risk/reward profiles.
META carries more volatility with a beta of 1.31 — expect wider price swings.
META is growing revenue faster at 23.8% — sustainability is the question.
META generates stronger free cash flow (14.8B), providing more financial flexibility.
Bottom Line
META scores higher overall (75/100 vs 48/100), backed by strong 30.1% margins and 23.8% revenue growth. ZD offers better value entry with a 77.5% margin of safety. Both earn "Strong Buy" and "Hold" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.
This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.
Meta Platforms Inc.
COMMUNICATION SERVICES · INTERNET CONTENT & INFORMATION · USA
Meta Platforms, Inc. develops products that enable people to connect and share with friends and family through mobile devices, PCs, virtual reality headsets, wearables and home devices around the world. The company is headquartered in Menlo Park, California.
Visit Website →Ziff Davis Inc
COMMUNICATION SERVICES · ADVERTISING AGENCIES · USA
J2 Global, Inc. provides Internet services worldwide. The company is headquartered in Los Angeles, California.
Visit Website →Compare with Other INTERNET CONTENT & INFORMATION Stocks
Want to dig deeper into these stocks?