WallStSmart

McGraw Hill, Inc. (MH)vsTarget Corporation (TGT)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Target Corporation generates 4988% more annual revenue ($107.70B vs $2.12B). MH leads profitability with a 4.4% profit margin vs 4.1%. TGT trades at a lower P/E of 16.2x. TGT earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 66/100 (B-).

MH

Buy

57

out of 100

Grade: C

Growth: 6.0Profit: 5.0Value: 5.3Quality: 3.5
Piotroski: 6/9Altman Z: 0.28

TGT

Strong Buy

66

out of 100

Grade: B-

Growth: 6.0Profit: 6.0Value: 6.0Quality: 4.5
Piotroski: 3/9Altman Z: 2.47
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

Intrinsic value data unavailable for MH.

TGTUndervalued (+5.3%)

Margin of Safety

+5.3%

Fair Value

$120.98

Current Price

$155.83

$34.85 discount

UndervaluedFair: $120.98Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

MH3 strengths · Avg: 8.7/10
EPS GrowthGrowth
9860.0%10/10

Earnings expanding 9860.0% YoY

Price/BookValuation
3.0x8/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

Operating MarginProfitability
21.5%8/10

Strong operational efficiency at 21.5%

TGT5 strengths · Avg: 8.8/10
EPS GrowthGrowth
100.5%10/10

Earnings expanding 100.5% YoY

Market CapQuality
$70.79B9/10

Large-cap with strong market position

Return on EquityProfitability
24.6%9/10

Every $100 of equity generates 25 in profit

P/E RatioValuation
16.2x8/10

Attractively priced relative to earnings

Free Cash FlowQuality
$2.43B8/10

Generating 2.4B in free cash flow

Areas to Watch

MH4 concerns · Avg: 3.3/10
P/E RatioValuation
26.1x4/10

Moderate valuation

Revenue GrowthGrowth
2.6%4/10

2.6% revenue growth

Profit MarginProfitability
4.4%3/10

4.4% margin — thin

Return on EquityProfitability
-9.2%2/10

ROE of -9.2% — below average capital efficiency

TGT4 concerns · Avg: 3.3/10
PEG RatioValuation
1.944/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

Profit MarginProfitability
4.1%3/10

4.1% margin — thin

Debt/EquityHealth
1.053/10

Elevated debt levels

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
3/93/10

Weak financial health signals

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : MH

The strongest argument for MH centers on EPS Growth, Price/Book, Operating Margin.

Bull Case : TGT

The strongest argument for TGT centers on EPS Growth, Market Cap, Return on Equity.

Bear Case : MH

The primary concerns for MH are P/E Ratio, Revenue Growth, Profit Margin. Debt-to-equity of 3.37 is elevated, increasing financial risk. Thin 4.4% margins leave little buffer for downturns.

Bear Case : TGT

The primary concerns for TGT are PEG Ratio, Profit Margin, Debt/Equity. Thin 4.1% margins leave little buffer for downturns.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

TGT is growing revenue faster at 5.3% — sustainability is the question.

TGT generates stronger free cash flow (2.4B), providing more financial flexibility.

Monitor EDUCATION & TRAINING SERVICES industry trends, competitive dynamics, and regulatory changes.

Bottom Line

TGT scores higher overall (66/100 vs 57/100). Both earn "Strong Buy" and "Buy" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

McGraw Hill, Inc.

CONSUMER DEFENSIVE · EDUCATION & TRAINING SERVICES · USA

McGraw Hill, Inc., doing business as McGraw Hill, provides information solutions for K-12, higher education, and professional markets in the United States and internationally.

Target Corporation

CONSUMER DEFENSIVE · DISCOUNT STORES · USA

Target Corporation is an American retail corporation. Their retail formats include the discount store Target, the hypermarket SuperTarget, and small-format stores previously named CityTarget and TargetExpress before being consolidated under the Target branding.

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?