MP Materials Corp (MP)vsNamib Minerals Ordinary Shares (NAMM)

MP

MP Materials Corp

NYSE

$54.28

-3.09%

BASIC MATERIALS · Cap: $10.06B

NAMM

Namib Minerals Ordinary Shares

NASDAQ

$1.86

-4.00%

BASIC MATERIALS · Cap: $95.89M

⚡

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

MP Materials Corp generates 321% more annual revenue ($347.57M vs $82.59M). NAMM leads profitability with a 122.5% profit margin vs -20.5%. NAMM earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 43/100 (D).

MP

Avoid

out of 100

Grade: F

Growth: 4.7Profit: 2.0Value: 4.0Quality: 7.5

Piotroski: 4/9Altman Z: 1.53

NAMM

Hold

out of 100

Grade: D

Growth: 6.7Profit: 8.0Value: 6.7Quality: 6.5

Piotroski: 3/9Altman Z: 7.98

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

MPSignificantly Overvalued (-50.1%)

Margin of Safety

-50.1%

Fair Value

$37.06

Current Price

$54.28

$17.22 premium

UndervaluedFair: $37.06Overvalued

Intrinsic value data unavailable for NAMM.

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

MP1 strengths · Avg: 10.0/10

Revenue GrowthGrowth

118.6%10/10

Revenue surging 118.6% year-over-year

NAMM5 strengths · Avg: 10.0/10

P/E RatioValuation

1.0x10/10

Attractively priced relative to earnings

Profit MarginProfitability

122.5%10/10

Keeps 123 of every $100 in revenue as profit

Operating MarginProfitability

31.6%10/10

Strong operational efficiency at 31.6%

Debt/EquityHealth

-0.1310/10

Conservative balance sheet, low leverage

Altman Z-ScoreHealth

7.9810/10

Safe zone — low bankruptcy risk

Areas to Watch

MP4 concerns · Avg: 2.5/10

Altman Z-ScoreHealth

1.534/10

Distress zone — elevated risk

Return on EquityProfitability

-3.0%2/10

ROE of -3.0% — below average capital efficiency

EPS GrowthGrowth

-55.6%2/10

Earnings declined 55.6%

Free Cash FlowQuality

$-79.28M2/10

Negative free cash flow — burning cash

NAMM4 concerns · Avg: 3.3/10

EPS GrowthGrowth

0.0%4/10

0.0% earnings growth

Market CapQuality

$95.89M3/10

Smaller company, higher risk/reward

Return on EquityProfitability

0.0%3/10

ROE of 0.0% — below average capital efficiency

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality

3/93/10

Weak financial health signals

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : MP

The strongest argument for MP centers on Revenue Growth. Revenue growth of 118.6% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bull Case : NAMM

The strongest argument for NAMM centers on P/E Ratio, Profit Margin, Operating Margin. Profitability is solid with margins at 122.5% and operating margin at 31.6%.

Bear Case : MP

The primary concerns for MP are Altman Z-Score, Return on Equity, EPS Growth.

Bear Case : NAMM

The primary concerns for NAMM are EPS Growth, Market Cap, Return on Equity.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

MP profiles as a hypergrowth stock while NAMM is a mature play — different risk/reward profiles.

MP carries more volatility with a beta of 1.84 — expect wider price swings.

MP is growing revenue faster at 118.6% — sustainability is the question.

NAMM generates stronger free cash flow (1M), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

NAMM scores higher overall (43/100 vs 29/100), backed by strong 122.5% margins. Both earn "Hold" and "Avoid" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

MP Materials Corp

BASIC MATERIALS · OTHER INDUSTRIAL METALS & MINING · USA

MP Materials Corp. The company is headquartered in Las Vegas, Nevada.

Namib Minerals Ordinary Shares

BASIC MATERIALS · GOLD · USA

Namib Minerals engages in the production, development, and exploration of gold and critical green metals.

Compare with Other OTHER INDUSTRIAL METALS & MINING Stocks

MP vs BHP MP vs RIO MP vs VALE MP vs TECK MP vs MTRN NAMM vs BHP NAMM vs RIO NAMM vs VALE NAMM vs TECK NAMM vs MTRN

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?

Full MP Analysis →Full NAMM Analysis →