WallStSmart

MP Materials Corp (MP)vsNutrien Ltd (NTR)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Nutrien Ltd generates 6456% more annual revenue ($27.29B vs $416.25M). NTR leads profitability with a 8.7% profit margin vs -14.6%. NTR earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 59/100 (C).

MP

Avoid

30

out of 100

Grade: F

Growth: 4.7Profit: 2.0Value: 4.0Quality: 7.5
Piotroski: 4/9Altman Z: 1.51

NTR

Buy

59

out of 100

Grade: C

Growth: 3.3Profit: 6.5Value: 5.3Quality: 6.5
Piotroski: 6/9Altman Z: 1.73
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

MPSignificantly Overvalued (-22.9%)

Margin of Safety

-22.9%

Fair Value

$44.19

Current Price

$50.51

$6.32 premium

UndervaluedFair: $44.19Overvalued
NTRSignificantly Overvalued (-29.7%)

Margin of Safety

-29.7%

Fair Value

$56.35

Current Price

$78.45

$22.10 premium

UndervaluedFair: $56.35Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

MP1 strengths · Avg: 10.0/10
Revenue GrowthGrowth
119.7%10/10

Revenue surging 119.7% year-over-year

NTR3 strengths · Avg: 8.7/10
Price/BookValuation
1.4x10/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

P/E RatioValuation
16.1x8/10

Attractively priced relative to earnings

Free Cash FlowQuality
$1.99B8/10

Generating 2.0B in free cash flow

Areas to Watch

MP4 concerns · Avg: 2.5/10
Altman Z-ScoreHealth
1.514/10

Distress zone — elevated risk

Return on EquityProfitability
-3.0%2/10

ROE of -3.0% — below average capital efficiency

EPS GrowthGrowth
-55.6%2/10

Earnings declined 55.6%

Free Cash FlowQuality
$-223.49M2/10

Negative free cash flow — burning cash

NTR3 concerns · Avg: 4.0/10
Revenue GrowthGrowth
4.0%4/10

4.0% revenue growth

EPS GrowthGrowth
1.2%4/10

1.2% earnings growth

Altman Z-ScoreHealth
1.734/10

Distress zone — elevated risk

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : MP

The strongest argument for MP centers on Revenue Growth. Revenue growth of 119.7% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bull Case : NTR

The strongest argument for NTR centers on Price/Book, P/E Ratio, Free Cash Flow. PEG of 1.35 suggests the stock is reasonably priced for its growth.

Bear Case : MP

The primary concerns for MP are Altman Z-Score, Return on Equity, EPS Growth.

Bear Case : NTR

The primary concerns for NTR are Revenue Growth, EPS Growth, Altman Z-Score.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

MP profiles as a hypergrowth stock while NTR is a value play — different risk/reward profiles.

MP carries more volatility with a beta of 1.95 — expect wider price swings.

MP is growing revenue faster at 119.7% — sustainability is the question.

NTR generates stronger free cash flow (2.0B), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

NTR scores higher overall (59/100 vs 30/100). Both earn "Buy" and "Avoid" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

MP Materials Corp

BASIC MATERIALS · OTHER INDUSTRIAL METALS & MINING · USA

MP Materials Corp. The company is headquartered in Las Vegas, Nevada.

Nutrien Ltd

BASIC MATERIALS · AGRICULTURAL INPUTS · USA

Nutrien Ltd. provides inputs, services and solutions for crops. The company is headquartered in Saskatoon, Canada.

Visit Website →

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?