WallStSmart

MP Materials Corp (MP)vsSociedad Quimica y Minera de Chile SA ADR B (SQM)

VS
⚡

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Sociedad Quimica y Minera de Chile SA ADR B generates 1516% more annual revenue ($6.73B vs $416.25M). SQM leads profitability with a 20.6% profit margin vs -14.6%. SQM earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 85/100 (A).

MP

Avoid

30

out of 100

Grade: F

Growth: 4.7Profit: 2.0Value: 5.3Quality: 7.5
Piotroski: 4/9Altman Z: 1.51

SQM

Exceptional Buy

85

out of 100

Grade: A

Growth: 7.3Profit: 8.5Value: 7.7Quality: 7.0
Piotroski: 4/9Altman Z: 2.05
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

MPUndervalued (+5.0%)

Margin of Safety

+5.0%

Fair Value

$43.82

Current Price

$38.34

$5.48 discount

UndervaluedFair: $43.82Overvalued

Intrinsic value data unavailable for SQM.

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

MP1 strengths · Avg: 10.0/10
Revenue GrowthGrowth
119.7%10/10

Revenue surging 119.7% year-over-year

SQM6 strengths · Avg: 9.7/10
P/E RatioValuation
11.8x10/10

Attractively priced relative to earnings

Operating MarginProfitability
48.8%10/10

Strong operational efficiency at 48.8%

Revenue GrowthGrowth
136.7%10/10

Revenue surging 136.7% year-over-year

EPS GrowthGrowth
646.0%10/10

Earnings expanding 646.0% YoY

Return on EquityProfitability
22.1%9/10

Every $100 of equity generates 22 in profit

Profit MarginProfitability
20.6%9/10

Keeps 21 of every $100 in revenue as profit

Areas to Watch

MP4 concerns · Avg: 2.5/10
Altman Z-ScoreHealth
1.514/10

Distress zone — elevated risk

Return on EquityProfitability
-3.0%2/10

ROE of -3.0% — below average capital efficiency

EPS GrowthGrowth
-55.6%2/10

Earnings declined 55.6%

Free Cash FlowQuality
$-223.49M2/10

Negative free cash flow — burning cash

SQM0 concerns · Avg: 0/10

No major concerns identified

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : MP

The strongest argument for MP centers on Revenue Growth. Revenue growth of 119.7% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bull Case : SQM

The strongest argument for SQM centers on P/E Ratio, Operating Margin, Revenue Growth. Profitability is solid with margins at 20.6% and operating margin at 48.8%. Revenue growth of 136.7% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bear Case : MP

The primary concerns for MP are Altman Z-Score, Return on Equity, EPS Growth.

Bear Case : SQM

No major red flags identified for SQM, but monitor valuation.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

MP profiles as a hypergrowth stock while SQM is a growth play — different risk/reward profiles.

MP carries more volatility with a beta of 1.99 — expect wider price swings.

SQM is growing revenue faster at 136.7% — sustainability is the question.

SQM generates stronger free cash flow (761M), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

SQM scores higher overall (85/100 vs 30/100), backed by strong 20.6% margins and 136.7% revenue growth. Both earn "Exceptional Buy" and "Avoid" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

MP Materials Corp

BASIC MATERIALS · OTHER INDUSTRIAL METALS & MINING · USA

MP Materials Corp. The company is headquartered in Las Vegas, Nevada.

Sociedad Quimica y Minera de Chile SA ADR B

BASIC MATERIALS · SPECIALTY CHEMICALS · USA

Sociedad Qumica y Minera de Chile SA produces and distributes specialty plant nutrients, iodine and its derivatives, lithium and its derivatives, potassium chloride and sulfate, industrial chemicals and other products and services worldwide. The company is headquartered in Santiago, Chile.

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?