WallStSmart

Nasdaq Inc (NDAQ)vsTransUnion (TRU)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Nasdaq Inc generates 15% more annual revenue ($5.25B vs $4.58B). NDAQ leads profitability with a 34.1% profit margin vs 10.0%. TRU appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 1.14. NDAQ earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 69/100 (B-).

NDAQ

Strong Buy

69

out of 100

Grade: B-

Growth: 7.3Profit: 8.5Value: 10.0Quality: 6.5
Piotroski: 5/9

TRU

Strong Buy

66

out of 100

Grade: B-

Growth: 7.3Profit: 6.5Value: 10.0Quality: 7.5
Piotroski: 6/9Altman Z: 1.52
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

NDAQUndervalued (+44.4%)

Margin of Safety

+44.4%

Fair Value

$144.61

Current Price

$83.74

$60.87 discount

UndervaluedFair: $144.61Overvalued
TRUUndervalued (+33.9%)

Margin of Safety

+33.9%

Fair Value

$108.58

Current Price

$67.72

$40.86 discount

UndervaluedFair: $108.58Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

NDAQ3 strengths · Avg: 9.3/10
Profit MarginProfitability
34.1%10/10

Keeps 34 of every $100 in revenue as profit

Operating MarginProfitability
47.6%10/10

Strong operational efficiency at 47.6%

EPS GrowthGrowth
47.6%8/10

Earnings expanding 47.6% YoY

TRU2 strengths · Avg: 9.0/10
EPS GrowthGrowth
52.8%10/10

Earnings expanding 52.8% YoY

Price/BookValuation
2.9x8/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

Areas to Watch

NDAQ2 concerns · Avg: 4.0/10
PEG RatioValuation
2.104/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

P/E RatioValuation
28.0x4/10

Moderate valuation

TRU3 concerns · Avg: 3.7/10
P/E RatioValuation
29.6x4/10

Moderate valuation

Altman Z-ScoreHealth
1.524/10

Distress zone — elevated risk

Debt/EquityHealth
1.153/10

Elevated debt levels

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : NDAQ

The strongest argument for NDAQ centers on Profit Margin, Operating Margin, EPS Growth. Profitability is solid with margins at 34.1% and operating margin at 47.6%. Revenue growth of 13.4% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bull Case : TRU

The strongest argument for TRU centers on EPS Growth, Price/Book. Revenue growth of 13.0% demonstrates continued momentum. PEG of 1.14 suggests the stock is reasonably priced for its growth.

Bear Case : NDAQ

The primary concerns for NDAQ are PEG Ratio, P/E Ratio.

Bear Case : TRU

The primary concerns for TRU are P/E Ratio, Altman Z-Score, Debt/Equity.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

NDAQ profiles as a mature stock while TRU is a value play — different risk/reward profiles.

TRU carries more volatility with a beta of 1.70 — expect wider price swings.

NDAQ is growing revenue faster at 13.4% — sustainability is the question.

NDAQ generates stronger free cash flow (536M), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

NDAQ scores higher overall (69/100 vs 66/100), backed by strong 34.1% margins and 13.4% revenue growth. TRU offers better value entry with a 33.9% margin of safety. Both earn "Strong Buy" and "Strong Buy" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Nasdaq Inc

FINANCIAL SERVICES · FINANCIAL DATA & STOCK EXCHANGES · USA

Nasdaq, Inc. is an American multinational financial services corporation that owns and operates stock exchanges in the United States and Europe. It is headquartered in New York City.

Visit Website →

TransUnion

FINANCIAL SERVICES · FINANCIAL DATA & STOCK EXCHANGES · USA

TransUnion offers risk and information solutions. The company is headquartered in Chicago, Illinois.

Visit Website →

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?