NI Holdings Inc (NODK)vsWells Fargo & Company (WFC)
NODK
NI Holdings Inc
$15.05
-0.13%
FINANCIAL SERVICES · Cap: $312.80M
WFC
Wells Fargo & Company
$88.71
-1.76%
FINANCIAL SERVICES · Cap: $273.04B
Smart Verdict
WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison
Wells Fargo & Company generates 30950% more annual revenue ($83.03B vs $267.39M). WFC leads profitability with a 27.2% profit margin vs 2.9%. WFC trades at a lower P/E of 13.1x. WFC earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 76/100 (B+).
NODK
Hold41
out of 100
Grade: D
WFC
Strong Buy76
out of 100
Grade: B+
Key Strengths & Concerns
Side-by-side fundamental analysis
Key Strengths
Reasonable price relative to book value
Earnings expanding 94.9% YoY
Mega-cap, among the largest globally
Strong operational efficiency at 37.4%
Keeps 27 of every $100 in revenue as profit
Attractively priced relative to earnings
Reasonable price relative to book value
Earnings expanding 25.0% YoY
Areas to Watch
Distress zone — elevated risk
Smaller company, higher risk/reward
2.9% margin — thin
Operating margin of 0.3%
Expensive relative to growth rate
Distress zone — elevated risk
Elevated debt levels
Comparative Analysis Report
WallStSmart ResearchBull Case : NODK
The strongest argument for NODK centers on Price/Book, EPS Growth.
Bull Case : WFC
The strongest argument for WFC centers on Market Cap, Operating Margin, Profit Margin. Profitability is solid with margins at 27.2% and operating margin at 37.4%.
Bear Case : NODK
The primary concerns for NODK are Altman Z-Score, Market Cap, Profit Margin. A P/E of 41.4x leaves little room for execution misses. Thin 2.9% margins leave little buffer for downturns.
Bear Case : WFC
The primary concerns for WFC are PEG Ratio, Altman Z-Score, Debt/Equity. Debt-to-equity of 2.55 is elevated, increasing financial risk.
Key Dynamics to Monitor
NODK profiles as a value stock while WFC is a mature play — different risk/reward profiles.
WFC carries more volatility with a beta of 0.92 — expect wider price swings.
WFC is growing revenue faster at 9.5% — sustainability is the question.
WFC generates stronger free cash flow (6.8B), providing more financial flexibility.
Bottom Line
WFC scores higher overall (76/100 vs 41/100), backed by strong 27.2% margins. Both earn "Strong Buy" and "Hold" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.
This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.
NI Holdings Inc
FINANCIAL SERVICES · INSURANCE - PROPERTY & CASUALTY · USA
NI Holdings, Inc. underwrites property and casualty insurance products in the United States. The company is headquartered in Fargo, North Dakota.
Wells Fargo & Company
FINANCIAL SERVICES · BANKS - DIVERSIFIED · USA
Wells Fargo & Company is an American multinational financial services company with corporate headquarters in San Francisco, California, operational headquarters in Manhattan, and managerial offices throughout the United States and overseas.
Compare with Other INSURANCE - PROPERTY & CASUALTY Stocks
Want to dig deeper into these stocks?