WallStSmart

Oshkosh Corporation (OSK)vsConstruction Partners Inc (ROAD)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Oshkosh Corporation generates 241% more annual revenue ($10.42B vs $3.06B). OSK leads profitability with a 6.2% profit margin vs 4.0%. ROAD appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 1.57. ROAD earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 58/100 (C).

OSK

Hold

48

out of 100

Grade: D+

Growth: 3.3Profit: 5.5Value: 6.7Quality: 6.5
Piotroski: 2/9Altman Z: 2.82

ROAD

Buy

58

out of 100

Grade: C

Growth: 10.0Profit: 5.5Value: 3.3Quality: 5.3
Piotroski: 3/9Altman Z: 1.64
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

OSKUndervalued (+32.8%)

Margin of Safety

+32.8%

Fair Value

$259.60

Current Price

$147.37

$112.23 discount

UndervaluedFair: $259.60Overvalued
ROADOvervalued (-13.2%)

Margin of Safety

-13.2%

Fair Value

$118.60

Current Price

$115.35

$3.25 premium

UndervaluedFair: $118.60Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

OSK2 strengths · Avg: 8.0/10
P/E RatioValuation
14.7x8/10

Attractively priced relative to earnings

Price/BookValuation
2.0x8/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

ROAD2 strengths · Avg: 10.0/10
Revenue GrowthGrowth
44.1%10/10

Revenue surging 44.1% year-over-year

EPS GrowthGrowth
80.9%10/10

Earnings expanding 80.9% YoY

Areas to Watch

OSK4 concerns · Avg: 3.0/10
Revenue GrowthGrowth
3.5%4/10

3.5% revenue growth

Profit MarginProfitability
6.2%3/10

6.2% margin — thin

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
2/93/10

Weak financial health signals

PEG RatioValuation
6.512/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

ROAD4 concerns · Avg: 3.5/10
PEG RatioValuation
1.574/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

Altman Z-ScoreHealth
1.644/10

Distress zone — elevated risk

Profit MarginProfitability
4.0%3/10

4.0% margin — thin

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
3/93/10

Weak financial health signals

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : OSK

The strongest argument for OSK centers on P/E Ratio, Price/Book.

Bull Case : ROAD

The strongest argument for ROAD centers on Revenue Growth, EPS Growth. Revenue growth of 44.1% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bear Case : OSK

The primary concerns for OSK are Revenue Growth, Profit Margin, Piotroski F-Score.

Bear Case : ROAD

The primary concerns for ROAD are PEG Ratio, Altman Z-Score, Profit Margin. A P/E of 52.2x leaves little room for execution misses. Thin 4.0% margins leave little buffer for downturns.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

OSK profiles as a value stock while ROAD is a hypergrowth play — different risk/reward profiles.

OSK carries more volatility with a beta of 1.39 — expect wider price swings.

ROAD is growing revenue faster at 44.1% — sustainability is the question.

OSK generates stronger free cash flow (526M), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

ROAD scores higher overall (58/100 vs 48/100) and 44.1% revenue growth. OSK offers better value entry with a 32.8% margin of safety. Both earn "Buy" and "Hold" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Oshkosh Corporation

INDUSTRIALS · FARM & HEAVY CONSTRUCTION MACHINERY · USA

Oshkosh Corporation designs, manufactures and markets specialty vehicles and bodies worldwide. The company is headquartered in Oshkosh, Wisconsin.

Construction Partners Inc

INDUSTRIALS · ENGINEERING & CONSTRUCTION · USA

Construction Partners, Inc., a civil infrastructure company, is engaged in the construction and maintenance of highways in Alabama, Florida, Georgia, North Carolina, and South Carolina. The company is headquartered in Dothan, Alabama.

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?