WallStSmart

Penske Automotive Group Inc (PAG)vsUber Technologies Inc (UBER)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Uber Technologies Inc generates 69% more annual revenue ($53.69B vs $31.72B). UBER leads profitability with a 15.9% profit margin vs 2.9%. PAG appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 2.09. UBER earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 54/100 (C-).

PAG

Buy

51

out of 100

Grade: C-

Growth: 2.7Profit: 5.5Value: 5.3Quality: 4.3
Piotroski: 4/9

UBER

Buy

54

out of 100

Grade: C-

Growth: 5.3Profit: 7.5Value: 6.0Quality: 5.5
Piotroski: 4/9Altman Z: 1.47
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

PAGFair Value (-1.7%)

Margin of Safety

-1.7%

Fair Value

$170.26

Current Price

$173.81

$3.55 premium

UndervaluedFair: $170.26Overvalued
UBERUndervalued (+34.1%)

Margin of Safety

+34.1%

Fair Value

$108.26

Current Price

$75.45

$32.81 discount

UndervaluedFair: $108.26Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

PAG2 strengths · Avg: 8.0/10
P/E RatioValuation
12.3x8/10

Attractively priced relative to earnings

Price/BookValuation
2.1x8/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

UBER3 strengths · Avg: 9.0/10
Return on EquityProfitability
35.3%10/10

Every $100 of equity generates 35 in profit

Market CapQuality
$156.19B9/10

Large-cap with strong market position

Free Cash FlowQuality
$2.29B8/10

Generating 2.3B in free cash flow

Areas to Watch

PAG4 concerns · Avg: 3.3/10
PEG RatioValuation
2.094/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

Profit MarginProfitability
2.9%3/10

2.9% margin — thin

Operating MarginProfitability
3.7%3/10

Operating margin of 3.7%

Debt/EquityHealth
1.563/10

Elevated debt levels

UBER3 concerns · Avg: 2.0/10
PEG RatioValuation
4.512/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

EPS GrowthGrowth
-84.6%2/10

Earnings declined 84.6%

Altman Z-ScoreHealth
1.472/10

Distress zone — elevated risk

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : PAG

The strongest argument for PAG centers on P/E Ratio, Price/Book.

Bull Case : UBER

The strongest argument for UBER centers on Return on Equity, Market Cap, Free Cash Flow. Profitability is solid with margins at 15.9% and operating margin at 14.6%. Revenue growth of 14.5% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bear Case : PAG

The primary concerns for PAG are PEG Ratio, Profit Margin, Operating Margin. Debt-to-equity of 1.56 is elevated, increasing financial risk. Thin 2.9% margins leave little buffer for downturns.

Bear Case : UBER

The primary concerns for UBER are PEG Ratio, EPS Growth, Altman Z-Score.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

PAG profiles as a value stock while UBER is a mature play — different risk/reward profiles.

UBER carries more volatility with a beta of 1.16 — expect wider price swings.

UBER is growing revenue faster at 14.5% — sustainability is the question.

UBER generates stronger free cash flow (2.3B), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

UBER scores higher overall (54/100 vs 51/100), backed by strong 15.9% margins and 14.5% revenue growth. Both earn "Buy" and "Buy" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Penske Automotive Group Inc

CONSUMER CYCLICAL · AUTO & TRUCK DEALERSHIPS · USA

Penske Automotive Group, Inc., a diversified transportation services company, operates commercial and automotive truck dealerships. The company is headquartered in Bloomfield Hills, Michigan.

Visit Website →

Uber Technologies Inc

TECHNOLOGY · SOFTWARE - APPLICATION · USA

Uber Technologies, Inc., commonly known as Uber, is an American technology company. Its services include ride-hailing, food delivery (Uber Eats), package delivery, couriers, freight transportation, and, through a partnership with Lime, electric bicycle and motorized scooter rental. The company is based in San Francisco, California.

Visit Website →

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?