WallStSmart

ProPetro Holding Corp (PUMP)vsExxon Mobil Corp (XOM)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Exxon Mobil Corp generates 27518% more annual revenue ($326.01B vs $1.18B). XOM leads profitability with a 7.8% profit margin vs -1.1%. XOM earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 50/100 (C-).

PUMP

Avoid

29

out of 100

Grade: F

Growth: 2.0Profit: 2.0Value: 6.7Quality: 6.5
Piotroski: 3/9Altman Z: 2.11

XOM

Buy

50

out of 100

Grade: C-

Growth: 2.7Profit: 5.5Value: 4.7Quality: 6.5
Piotroski: 1/9Altman Z: 3.44
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

PUMPUndervalued (+44.6%)

Margin of Safety

+44.6%

Fair Value

$20.99

Current Price

$15.77

$5.22 discount

UndervaluedFair: $20.99Overvalued
XOMSignificantly Overvalued (-45.2%)

Margin of Safety

-45.2%

Fair Value

$106.68

Current Price

$148.69

$42.01 premium

UndervaluedFair: $106.68Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

PUMP2 strengths · Avg: 8.5/10
Debt/EquityHealth
0.309/10

Conservative balance sheet, low leverage

Price/BookValuation
2.0x8/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

XOM5 strengths · Avg: 9.0/10
Market CapQuality
$634.91B10/10

Mega-cap, among the largest globally

Altman Z-ScoreHealth
3.4410/10

Safe zone — low bankruptcy risk

Debt/EquityHealth
0.279/10

Conservative balance sheet, low leverage

Price/BookValuation
2.4x8/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

Free Cash FlowQuality
$2.23B8/10

Generating 2.2B in free cash flow

Areas to Watch

PUMP4 concerns · Avg: 2.5/10
Market CapQuality
$1.93B3/10

Smaller company, higher risk/reward

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
3/93/10

Weak financial health signals

Return on EquityProfitability
-1.4%2/10

ROE of -1.4% — below average capital efficiency

Revenue GrowthGrowth
-24.7%2/10

Revenue declined 24.7%

XOM4 concerns · Avg: 3.5/10
P/E RatioValuation
25.7x4/10

Moderate valuation

Revenue GrowthGrowth
2.6%4/10

2.6% revenue growth

Profit MarginProfitability
7.8%3/10

7.8% margin — thin

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
1/93/10

Weak financial health signals

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : PUMP

The strongest argument for PUMP centers on Debt/Equity, Price/Book.

Bull Case : XOM

The strongest argument for XOM centers on Market Cap, Altman Z-Score, Debt/Equity. PEG of 1.40 suggests the stock is reasonably priced for its growth.

Bear Case : PUMP

The primary concerns for PUMP are Market Cap, Piotroski F-Score, Return on Equity.

Bear Case : XOM

The primary concerns for XOM are P/E Ratio, Revenue Growth, Profit Margin.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

PUMP profiles as a turnaround stock while XOM is a value play — different risk/reward profiles.

PUMP carries more volatility with a beta of 0.77 — expect wider price swings.

XOM is growing revenue faster at 2.6% — sustainability is the question.

XOM generates stronger free cash flow (2.2B), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

XOM scores higher overall (50/100 vs 29/100). PUMP offers better value entry with a 44.6% margin of safety. Both earn "Buy" and "Avoid" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

ProPetro Holding Corp

ENERGY · OIL & GAS EQUIPMENT & SERVICES · USA

ProPetro Holding Corp. The company is headquartered in Midland, Texas.

Visit Website →

Exxon Mobil Corp

ENERGY · OIL & GAS INTEGRATED · USA

Exxon Mobil Corporation, stylized as ExxonMobil, is an American multinational oil and gas corporation headquartered in Irving, Texas. It is the largest direct descendant of John D. Rockefeller's Standard Oil, and was formed on November 30, 1999 by the merger of Exxon (formerly the Standard Oil Company of New Jersey) and Mobil (formerly the Standard Oil Company of New York). ExxonMobil's primary brands are Exxon, Mobil, Esso, and ExxonMobil Chemical. ExxonMobil is incorporated in New Jersey.

Visit Website →

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?