WallStSmart

Quad Graphics Inc (QUAD)vsRaytheon Technologies Corp (RTX)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Raytheon Technologies Corp generates 3635% more annual revenue ($90.37B vs $2.42B). RTX leads profitability with a 8.0% profit margin vs 1.1%. QUAD appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 0.84. QUAD earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 60/100 (C+).

QUAD

Buy

60

out of 100

Grade: C+

Growth: 4.7Profit: 6.0Value: 7.0Quality: 5.0

RTX

Buy

59

out of 100

Grade: C

Growth: 7.3Profit: 6.0Value: 3.3Quality: 6.0
Piotroski: 6/9Altman Z: 1.55
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

Intrinsic value data unavailable for QUAD.

RTXSignificantly Overvalued (-52.1%)

Margin of Safety

-52.1%

Fair Value

$115.75

Current Price

$176.07

$60.32 premium

UndervaluedFair: $115.75Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

QUAD5 strengths · Avg: 8.8/10
Return on EquityProfitability
30.2%10/10

Every $100 of equity generates 30 in profit

EPS GrowthGrowth
136.0%10/10

Earnings expanding 136.0% YoY

PEG RatioValuation
0.848/10

Growing faster than its price suggests

P/E RatioValuation
13.7x8/10

Attractively priced relative to earnings

Price/BookValuation
2.9x8/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

RTX3 strengths · Avg: 8.7/10
Market CapQuality
$237.11B10/10

Mega-cap, among the largest globally

EPS GrowthGrowth
32.5%8/10

Earnings expanding 32.5% YoY

Free Cash FlowQuality
$1.21B8/10

Generating 1.2B in free cash flow

Areas to Watch

QUAD4 concerns · Avg: 2.8/10
Market CapQuality
$407.66M3/10

Smaller company, higher risk/reward

Profit MarginProfitability
1.1%3/10

1.1% margin — thin

Operating MarginProfitability
3.7%3/10

Operating margin of 3.7%

Revenue GrowthGrowth
-11.0%2/10

Revenue declined 11.0%

RTX3 concerns · Avg: 4.0/10
PEG RatioValuation
2.394/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

P/E RatioValuation
33.0x4/10

Premium valuation, high expectations priced in

Altman Z-ScoreHealth
1.554/10

Distress zone — elevated risk

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : QUAD

The strongest argument for QUAD centers on Return on Equity, EPS Growth, PEG Ratio. PEG of 0.84 suggests the stock is reasonably priced for its growth.

Bull Case : RTX

The strongest argument for RTX centers on Market Cap, EPS Growth, Free Cash Flow.

Bear Case : QUAD

The primary concerns for QUAD are Market Cap, Profit Margin, Operating Margin. Thin 1.1% margins leave little buffer for downturns.

Bear Case : RTX

The primary concerns for RTX are PEG Ratio, P/E Ratio, Altman Z-Score.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

QUAD carries more volatility with a beta of 1.15 — expect wider price swings.

RTX is growing revenue faster at 8.7% — sustainability is the question.

RTX generates stronger free cash flow (1.2B), providing more financial flexibility.

Monitor SPECIALTY BUSINESS SERVICES industry trends, competitive dynamics, and regulatory changes.

Bottom Line

QUAD scores higher overall (60/100 vs 59/100). Both earn "Buy" and "Buy" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Quad Graphics Inc

INDUSTRIALS · SPECIALTY BUSINESS SERVICES · USA

Quad / Graphics, Inc. offers worldwide marketing solutions. The company is headquartered in Sussex, Wisconsin.

Raytheon Technologies Corp

INDUSTRIALS · AEROSPACE & DEFENSE · USA

Raytheon Technologies Corporation is an American multinational aerospace and defense conglomerate headquartered in Waltham, Massachusetts. It is one of the largest aerospace, intelligence services providers, and defense manufacturers in the world by revenue and market capitalization. Raytheon Technologies (RTX) researches, develops, and manufactures advanced technology products in the aerospace and defense industry, including aircraft engines, avionics, aerostructures, cybersecurity, guided missiles, air defense systems, satellites, and drones.

Visit Website →

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?