WallStSmart

Regions Financial Corporation (RF)vsWells Fargo & Company (WFC)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Wells Fargo & Company generates 1047% more annual revenue ($83.03B vs $7.24B). RF leads profitability with a 30.8% profit margin vs 27.2%. WFC appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 1.51. WFC earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 76/100 (B+).

RF

Strong Buy

69

out of 100

Grade: B-

Growth: 5.3Profit: 7.5Value: 5.7Quality: 5.0
Piotroski: 7/9Altman Z: -0.41

WFC

Strong Buy

76

out of 100

Grade: B+

Growth: 7.3Profit: 7.5Value: 5.7Quality: 3.0
Piotroski: 4/9Altman Z: -0.38

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

RF4 strengths · Avg: 9.5/10
Price/BookValuation
1.5x10/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

Profit MarginProfitability
30.8%10/10

Keeps 31 of every $100 in revenue as profit

Operating MarginProfitability
39.3%10/10

Strong operational efficiency at 39.3%

P/E RatioValuation
12.4x8/10

Attractively priced relative to earnings

WFC6 strengths · Avg: 8.8/10
Market CapQuality
$273.04B10/10

Mega-cap, among the largest globally

Operating MarginProfitability
37.4%10/10

Strong operational efficiency at 37.4%

Profit MarginProfitability
27.2%9/10

Keeps 27 of every $100 in revenue as profit

P/E RatioValuation
13.1x8/10

Attractively priced relative to earnings

Price/BookValuation
1.7x8/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

EPS GrowthGrowth
25.0%8/10

Earnings expanding 25.0% YoY

Areas to Watch

RF3 concerns · Avg: 3.3/10
PEG RatioValuation
1.624/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

Revenue GrowthGrowth
3.4%4/10

3.4% revenue growth

Altman Z-ScoreHealth
-0.412/10

Distress zone — elevated risk

WFC3 concerns · Avg: 2.3/10
PEG RatioValuation
1.514/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

Altman Z-ScoreHealth
-0.382/10

Distress zone — elevated risk

Debt/EquityHealth
2.551/10

Elevated debt levels

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : RF

The strongest argument for RF centers on Price/Book, Profit Margin, Operating Margin. Profitability is solid with margins at 30.8% and operating margin at 39.3%.

Bull Case : WFC

The strongest argument for WFC centers on Market Cap, Operating Margin, Profit Margin. Profitability is solid with margins at 27.2% and operating margin at 37.4%.

Bear Case : RF

The primary concerns for RF are PEG Ratio, Revenue Growth, Altman Z-Score.

Bear Case : WFC

The primary concerns for WFC are PEG Ratio, Altman Z-Score, Debt/Equity. Debt-to-equity of 2.55 is elevated, increasing financial risk.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

RF profiles as a value stock while WFC is a mature play — different risk/reward profiles.

RF carries more volatility with a beta of 1.00 — expect wider price swings.

WFC is growing revenue faster at 9.5% — sustainability is the question.

WFC generates stronger free cash flow (6.8B), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

WFC scores higher overall (76/100 vs 69/100), backed by strong 27.2% margins. Both earn "Strong Buy" and "Strong Buy" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Regions Financial Corporation

FINANCIAL SERVICES · BANKS - REGIONAL · USA

Regions Financial Corporation is a bank holding company headquartered in the Regions Center in Birmingham, Alabama. The company provides retail banking and commercial banking, trust, stockbrokerage, and mortgage services.

Wells Fargo & Company

FINANCIAL SERVICES · BANKS - DIVERSIFIED · USA

Wells Fargo & Company is an American multinational financial services company with corporate headquarters in San Francisco, California, operational headquarters in Manhattan, and managerial offices throughout the United States and overseas.

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?