Regional Management Corp (RM)vsWells Fargo & Company (WFC)
RM
Regional Management Corp
$32.99
+0.73%
FINANCIAL SERVICES · Cap: $310.73M
WFC
Wells Fargo & Company
$90.29
+0.94%
FINANCIAL SERVICES · Cap: $273.04B
Smart Verdict
WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison
Wells Fargo & Company generates 12716% more annual revenue ($83.03B vs $647.84M). WFC leads profitability with a 27.2% profit margin vs 7.2%. RM appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 0.90. WFC earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 76/100 (B+).
RM
Strong Buy67
out of 100
Grade: B-
WFC
Strong Buy76
out of 100
Grade: B+
Key Strengths & Concerns
Side-by-side fundamental analysis
Key Strengths
Attractively priced relative to earnings
Reasonable price relative to book value
Growing faster than its price suggests
Strong operational efficiency at 20.8%
Mega-cap, among the largest globally
Strong operational efficiency at 37.4%
Keeps 27 of every $100 in revenue as profit
Attractively priced relative to earnings
Reasonable price relative to book value
Earnings expanding 25.0% YoY
Areas to Watch
Distress zone — elevated risk
Smaller company, higher risk/reward
7.2% margin — thin
Earnings declined 17.5%
Expensive relative to growth rate
Distress zone — elevated risk
Elevated debt levels
Comparative Analysis Report
WallStSmart ResearchBull Case : RM
The strongest argument for RM centers on P/E Ratio, Price/Book, PEG Ratio. PEG of 0.90 suggests the stock is reasonably priced for its growth.
Bull Case : WFC
The strongest argument for WFC centers on Market Cap, Operating Margin, Profit Margin. Profitability is solid with margins at 27.2% and operating margin at 37.4%.
Bear Case : RM
The primary concerns for RM are Altman Z-Score, Market Cap, Profit Margin. Debt-to-equity of 4.54 is elevated, increasing financial risk.
Bear Case : WFC
The primary concerns for WFC are PEG Ratio, Altman Z-Score, Debt/Equity. Debt-to-equity of 2.55 is elevated, increasing financial risk.
Key Dynamics to Monitor
RM profiles as a value stock while WFC is a mature play — different risk/reward profiles.
RM carries more volatility with a beta of 0.99 — expect wider price swings.
WFC is growing revenue faster at 9.5% — sustainability is the question.
WFC generates stronger free cash flow (6.8B), providing more financial flexibility.
Bottom Line
WFC scores higher overall (76/100 vs 67/100), backed by strong 27.2% margins. Both earn "Strong Buy" and "Strong Buy" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.
This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.
Regional Management Corp
FINANCIAL SERVICES · CREDIT SERVICES · USA
Regional Management Corp, a diversified consumer finance company, offers various installment loan products primarily to clients with limited access to consumer credit from banks, savings companies, credit card companies, and other lenders. The company is headquartered in Greer, South Carolina.
Wells Fargo & Company
FINANCIAL SERVICES · BANKS - DIVERSIFIED · USA
Wells Fargo & Company is an American multinational financial services company with corporate headquarters in San Francisco, California, operational headquarters in Manhattan, and managerial offices throughout the United States and overseas.
Compare with Other CREDIT SERVICES Stocks
Want to dig deeper into these stocks?