WallStSmart

Sanmina Corporation (SANM)vsSonos Inc (SONO)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Sanmina Corporation generates 689% more annual revenue ($11.34B vs $1.44B). SANM leads profitability with a 2.3% profit margin vs -1.2%. SANM earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 68/100 (B-).

SANM

Strong Buy

68

out of 100

Grade: B-

Growth: 8.0Profit: 5.5Value: 6.7Quality: 5.8
Piotroski: 4/9Altman Z: 1.87

SONO

Hold

42

out of 100

Grade: D

Growth: 4.7Profit: 4.0Value: 6.7Quality: 5.0
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

SANMUndervalued (+18.9%)

Margin of Safety

+18.9%

Fair Value

$184.12

Current Price

$217.82

$33.70 discount

UndervaluedFair: $184.12Overvalued
SONOUndervalued (+42.1%)

Margin of Safety

+42.1%

Fair Value

$28.49

Current Price

$14.67

$13.82 discount

UndervaluedFair: $28.49Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

SANM3 strengths · Avg: 8.7/10
Revenue GrowthGrowth
102.3%10/10

Revenue surging 102.3% year-over-year

PEG RatioValuation
0.978/10

Growing faster than its price suggests

EPS GrowthGrowth
46.6%8/10

Earnings expanding 46.6% YoY

SONO1 strengths · Avg: 10.0/10
EPS GrowthGrowth
87.5%10/10

Earnings expanding 87.5% YoY

Areas to Watch

SANM3 concerns · Avg: 3.0/10
Altman Z-ScoreHealth
1.874/10

Grey zone — moderate risk

Profit MarginProfitability
2.3%3/10

2.3% margin — thin

P/E RatioValuation
45.6x2/10

Premium valuation, high expectations priced in

SONO4 concerns · Avg: 2.0/10
Market CapQuality
$1.77B3/10

Smaller company, higher risk/reward

Return on EquityProfitability
-3.9%2/10

ROE of -3.9% — below average capital efficiency

Revenue GrowthGrowth
-0.9%2/10

Revenue declined 0.9%

Profit MarginProfitability
-1.2%1/10

Currently unprofitable

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : SANM

The strongest argument for SANM centers on Revenue Growth, PEG Ratio, EPS Growth. Revenue growth of 102.3% demonstrates continued momentum. PEG of 0.97 suggests the stock is reasonably priced for its growth.

Bull Case : SONO

The strongest argument for SONO centers on EPS Growth.

Bear Case : SANM

The primary concerns for SANM are Altman Z-Score, Profit Margin, P/E Ratio. A P/E of 45.6x leaves little room for execution misses. Thin 2.3% margins leave little buffer for downturns.

Bear Case : SONO

The primary concerns for SONO are Market Cap, Return on Equity, Revenue Growth.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

SANM profiles as a hypergrowth stock while SONO is a turnaround play — different risk/reward profiles.

SONO carries more volatility with a beta of 2.00 — expect wider price swings.

SANM is growing revenue faster at 102.3% — sustainability is the question.

SANM generates stronger free cash flow (342M), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

SANM scores higher overall (68/100 vs 42/100) and 102.3% revenue growth. SONO offers better value entry with a 42.1% margin of safety. Both earn "Strong Buy" and "Hold" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Sanmina Corporation

TECHNOLOGY · ELECTRONIC COMPONENTS · USA

Sanmina Corporation offers integrated solutions for manufacturing, components, products and repair, logistics and after-sales services globally. The company is headquartered in San Jose, California.

Sonos Inc

TECHNOLOGY · CONSUMER ELECTRONICS · USA

Sonos, Inc. designs, develops, manufactures, and sells multi-room audio products in the Americas, Europe, the Middle East, Africa, and Asia Pacific. The company is headquartered in Santa Barbara, California.

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?