WallStSmart

SWK Holdings Corp (SWKH)vsWells Fargo & Company (WFC)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Wells Fargo & Company generates 220808% more annual revenue ($83.03B vs $37.58M). WFC leads profitability with a 27.2% profit margin vs -6.7%. WFC earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 76/100 (B+).

SWKH

Hold

43

out of 100

Grade: D

Growth: 4.7Profit: 3.5Value: 5.0Quality: 7.0
Piotroski: 5/9Altman Z: -13.01

WFC

Strong Buy

76

out of 100

Grade: B+

Growth: 7.3Profit: 7.5Value: 5.7Quality: 3.0
Piotroski: 4/9Altman Z: -0.38

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

SWKH3 strengths · Avg: 9.7/10
Price/BookValuation
0.8x10/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

EPS GrowthGrowth
157.1%10/10

Earnings expanding 157.1% YoY

Debt/EquityHealth
0.139/10

Conservative balance sheet, low leverage

WFC6 strengths · Avg: 8.8/10
Market CapQuality
$267.29B10/10

Mega-cap, among the largest globally

Operating MarginProfitability
37.4%10/10

Strong operational efficiency at 37.4%

Profit MarginProfitability
27.2%9/10

Keeps 27 of every $100 in revenue as profit

P/E RatioValuation
12.8x8/10

Attractively priced relative to earnings

Price/BookValuation
1.6x8/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

EPS GrowthGrowth
25.0%8/10

Earnings expanding 25.0% YoY

Areas to Watch

SWKH4 concerns · Avg: 2.3/10
Market CapQuality
$192.33M3/10

Smaller company, higher risk/reward

Return on EquityProfitability
-1.0%2/10

ROE of -1.0% — below average capital efficiency

Revenue GrowthGrowth
-27.8%2/10

Revenue declined 27.8%

Altman Z-ScoreHealth
-13.012/10

Distress zone — elevated risk

WFC3 concerns · Avg: 2.3/10
PEG RatioValuation
1.634/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

Altman Z-ScoreHealth
-0.382/10

Distress zone — elevated risk

Debt/EquityHealth
2.551/10

Elevated debt levels

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : SWKH

The strongest argument for SWKH centers on Price/Book, EPS Growth, Debt/Equity.

Bull Case : WFC

The strongest argument for WFC centers on Market Cap, Operating Margin, Profit Margin. Profitability is solid with margins at 27.2% and operating margin at 37.4%.

Bear Case : SWKH

The primary concerns for SWKH are Market Cap, Return on Equity, Revenue Growth.

Bear Case : WFC

The primary concerns for WFC are PEG Ratio, Altman Z-Score, Debt/Equity. Debt-to-equity of 2.55 is elevated, increasing financial risk.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

SWKH profiles as a turnaround stock while WFC is a mature play — different risk/reward profiles.

WFC carries more volatility with a beta of 0.92 — expect wider price swings.

WFC is growing revenue faster at 9.5% — sustainability is the question.

WFC generates stronger free cash flow (9.1B), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

WFC scores higher overall (76/100 vs 43/100), backed by strong 27.2% margins. Both earn "Strong Buy" and "Hold" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

SWK Holdings Corp

FINANCIAL SERVICES · ASSET MANAGEMENT · USA

SWK Holdings Corporation, a specialized finance company, focuses on the healthcare sector. The company is headquartered in Dallas, Texas.

Wells Fargo & Company

FINANCIAL SERVICES · BANKS - DIVERSIFIED · USA

Wells Fargo & Company is an American multinational financial services company with corporate headquarters in San Francisco, California, operational headquarters in Manhattan, and managerial offices throughout the United States and overseas.

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?