WallStSmart

Waters Corporation (WAT)vsWalmart Inc. (WMT)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Walmart Inc. generates 18815% more annual revenue ($713.16B vs $3.77B). WAT leads profitability with a 11.9% profit margin vs 3.1%. WAT appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 1.52. WAT earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 52/100 (C-).

WAT

Buy

52

out of 100

Grade: C-

Growth: 5.3Profit: 5.5Value: 3.3Quality: 6.8
Piotroski: 4/9Altman Z: 4.92

WMT

Hold

43

out of 100

Grade: D

Growth: 4.7Profit: 5.5Value: 2.7Quality: 6.0
Piotroski: 4/9Altman Z: 3.62
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

WATSignificantly Overvalued (-63.1%)

Margin of Safety

-63.1%

Fair Value

$201.83

Current Price

$355.13

$153.30 premium

UndervaluedFair: $201.83Overvalued
WMTSignificantly Overvalued (-90.0%)

Margin of Safety

-90.0%

Fair Value

$68.54

Current Price

$130.43

$61.89 premium

UndervaluedFair: $68.54Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

WAT2 strengths · Avg: 10.0/10
Revenue GrowthGrowth
91.5%10/10

Revenue surging 91.5% year-over-year

Altman Z-ScoreHealth
4.9210/10

Safe zone — low bankruptcy risk

WMT4 strengths · Avg: 9.3/10
Market CapQuality
$1.04T10/10

Mega-cap, among the largest globally

Altman Z-ScoreHealth
3.6210/10

Safe zone — low bankruptcy risk

Return on EquityProfitability
21.8%9/10

Every $100 of equity generates 22 in profit

Free Cash FlowQuality
$6.10B8/10

Generating 6.1B in free cash flow

Areas to Watch

WAT4 concerns · Avg: 3.3/10
PEG RatioValuation
1.524/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

Price/BookValuation
8.3x4/10

Trading at 8.3x book value

Return on EquityProfitability
5.2%3/10

ROE of 5.2% — below average capital efficiency

P/E RatioValuation
44.6x2/10

Premium valuation, high expectations priced in

WMT4 concerns · Avg: 3.0/10
Price/BookValuation
10.4x4/10

Trading at 10.4x book value

Profit MarginProfitability
3.1%3/10

3.1% margin — thin

Operating MarginProfitability
4.6%3/10

Operating margin of 4.6%

PEG RatioValuation
4.872/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : WAT

The strongest argument for WAT centers on Revenue Growth, Altman Z-Score. Revenue growth of 91.5% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bull Case : WMT

The strongest argument for WMT centers on Market Cap, Altman Z-Score, Return on Equity.

Bear Case : WAT

The primary concerns for WAT are PEG Ratio, Price/Book, Return on Equity. A P/E of 44.6x leaves little room for execution misses.

Bear Case : WMT

The primary concerns for WMT are Price/Book, Profit Margin, Operating Margin. A P/E of 47.7x leaves little room for execution misses. Thin 3.1% margins leave little buffer for downturns.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

WAT profiles as a growth stock while WMT is a value play — different risk/reward profiles.

WAT carries more volatility with a beta of 1.14 — expect wider price swings.

WAT is growing revenue faster at 91.5% — sustainability is the question.

WMT generates stronger free cash flow (6.1B), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

WAT scores higher overall (52/100 vs 43/100) and 91.5% revenue growth. Both earn "Buy" and "Hold" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Waters Corporation

HEALTHCARE · DIAGNOSTICS & RESEARCH · USA

Waters Corporation is a publicly traded Analytical Laboratory instrument and software company headquartered in Milford, Massachusetts.

Walmart Inc.

CONSUMER DEFENSIVE · DISCOUNT STORES · USA

Walmart Inc. is an American multinational retail corporation that operates a chain of hypermarkets, discount department stores, and grocery stores from the United States, headquartered in Bentonville, Arkansas. It also owns and operates Sam's Club retail warehouses.

Visit Website →

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?