WallStSmart

Waters Corporation (WAT)vsW. R. Berkley Corp (WRB)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

W. R. Berkley Corp generates 294% more annual revenue ($14.85B vs $3.77B). WRB leads profitability with a 12.6% profit margin vs 11.9%. WAT appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 1.52. WRB earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 65/100 (C+).

WAT

Buy

52

out of 100

Grade: C-

Growth: 5.3Profit: 5.5Value: 3.3Quality: 6.8
Piotroski: 4/9Altman Z: 4.92

WRB

Buy

65

out of 100

Grade: C+

Growth: 6.0Profit: 7.0Value: 5.0Quality: 4.8
Piotroski: 2/9
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

WATSignificantly Overvalued (-63.1%)

Margin of Safety

-63.1%

Fair Value

$201.83

Current Price

$355.13

$153.30 premium

UndervaluedFair: $201.83Overvalued

Intrinsic value data unavailable for WRB.

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

WAT2 strengths · Avg: 10.0/10
Revenue GrowthGrowth
91.5%10/10

Revenue surging 91.5% year-over-year

Altman Z-ScoreHealth
4.9210/10

Safe zone — low bankruptcy risk

WRB4 strengths · Avg: 8.3/10
Return on EquityProfitability
20.2%9/10

Every $100 of equity generates 20 in profit

P/E RatioValuation
14.1x8/10

Attractively priced relative to earnings

Price/BookValuation
2.6x8/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

EPS GrowthGrowth
26.0%8/10

Earnings expanding 26.0% YoY

Areas to Watch

WAT4 concerns · Avg: 3.3/10
PEG RatioValuation
1.524/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

Price/BookValuation
8.3x4/10

Trading at 8.3x book value

Return on EquityProfitability
5.2%3/10

ROE of 5.2% — below average capital efficiency

P/E RatioValuation
44.6x2/10

Premium valuation, high expectations priced in

WRB3 concerns · Avg: 3.0/10
Revenue GrowthGrowth
4.0%4/10

4.0% revenue growth

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
2/93/10

Weak financial health signals

PEG RatioValuation
3.872/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : WAT

The strongest argument for WAT centers on Revenue Growth, Altman Z-Score. Revenue growth of 91.5% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bull Case : WRB

The strongest argument for WRB centers on Return on Equity, P/E Ratio, Price/Book.

Bear Case : WAT

The primary concerns for WAT are PEG Ratio, Price/Book, Return on Equity. A P/E of 44.6x leaves little room for execution misses.

Bear Case : WRB

The primary concerns for WRB are Revenue Growth, Piotroski F-Score, PEG Ratio.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

WAT profiles as a growth stock while WRB is a value play — different risk/reward profiles.

WAT carries more volatility with a beta of 1.14 — expect wider price swings.

WAT is growing revenue faster at 91.5% — sustainability is the question.

WRB generates stronger free cash flow (640M), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

WRB scores higher overall (65/100 vs 52/100). Both earn "Buy" and "Buy" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Waters Corporation

HEALTHCARE · DIAGNOSTICS & RESEARCH · USA

Waters Corporation is a publicly traded Analytical Laboratory instrument and software company headquartered in Milford, Massachusetts.

W. R. Berkley Corp

FINANCIAL SERVICES · INSURANCE - PROPERTY & CASUALTY · USA

W. R. Berkley Corporation is a commercial lines property & casualty insurance holding company organized in Delaware and based in Greenwich, Connecticut.

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?