Affirm Holdings Inc (AFRM)vsWells Fargo & Company (WFC)
AFRM
Affirm Holdings Inc
$75.59
+5.03%
FINANCIAL SERVICES · Cap: $24.52B
WFC
Wells Fargo & Company
$87.44
+2.22%
FINANCIAL SERVICES · Cap: $250.35B
Smart Verdict
WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison
Wells Fargo & Company generates 1850% more annual revenue ($83.11B vs $4.26B). AFRM leads profitability with a 45.3% profit margin vs 27.6%. WFC appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 1.30. WFC earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 74/100 (B).
AFRM
Strong Buy70
out of 100
Grade: B
WFC
Strong Buy74
out of 100
Grade: B
Key Strengths & Concerns
Side-by-side fundamental analysis
Key Strengths
Every $100 of equity generates 35 in profit
Keeps 45 of every $100 in revenue as profit
Revenue surging 33.0% year-over-year
Earnings expanding 2187.0% YoY
Attractively priced relative to earnings
Mega-cap, among the largest globally
Attractively priced relative to earnings
Strong operational efficiency at 34.2%
Keeps 28 of every $100 in revenue as profit
Reasonable price relative to book value
Generating 6.8B in free cash flow
Areas to Watch
Elevated debt levels
Weak financial health signals
Expensive relative to growth rate
Distress zone — elevated risk
0.4% revenue growth
Elevated debt levels
Distress zone — elevated risk
Comparative Analysis Report
WallStSmart ResearchBull Case : AFRM
The strongest argument for AFRM centers on Return on Equity, Profit Margin, Revenue Growth. Profitability is solid with margins at 45.3% and operating margin at 12.6%. Revenue growth of 33.0% demonstrates continued momentum.
Bull Case : WFC
The strongest argument for WFC centers on Market Cap, P/E Ratio, Operating Margin. Profitability is solid with margins at 27.6% and operating margin at 34.2%. PEG of 1.30 suggests the stock is reasonably priced for its growth.
Bear Case : AFRM
The primary concerns for AFRM are Debt/Equity, Piotroski F-Score, PEG Ratio. Debt-to-equity of 1.79 is elevated, increasing financial risk.
Bear Case : WFC
The primary concerns for WFC are Revenue Growth, Debt/Equity, Altman Z-Score.
Key Dynamics to Monitor
AFRM profiles as a growth stock while WFC is a value play — different risk/reward profiles.
AFRM carries more volatility with a beta of 3.82 — expect wider price swings.
AFRM is growing revenue faster at 33.0% — sustainability is the question.
WFC generates stronger free cash flow (6.8B), providing more financial flexibility.
Bottom Line
WFC scores higher overall (74/100 vs 70/100), backed by strong 27.6% margins. Both earn "Strong Buy" and "Strong Buy" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.
This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.
Affirm Holdings Inc
FINANCIAL SERVICES · CREDIT SERVICES · USA
Affirm Holdings, Inc. operates a platform for digital and mobile commerce in the United States and Canada. The company is headquartered in San Francisco, California.
Visit Website →Wells Fargo & Company
FINANCIAL SERVICES · BANKS - DIVERSIFIED · USA
Wells Fargo & Company is an American multinational financial services company with corporate headquarters in San Francisco, California, operational headquarters in Manhattan, and managerial offices throughout the United States and overseas.
Compare with Other CREDIT SERVICES Stocks
Want to dig deeper into these stocks?