WallStSmart

AGCO Corporation (AGCO)vsMammoth Energy Services Inc (TUSK)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

AGCO Corporation generates 15032% more annual revenue ($10.35B vs $68.39M). AGCO leads profitability with a 5.2% profit margin vs 1.0%. AGCO earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 52/100 (C-).

AGCO

Buy

52

out of 100

Grade: C-

Growth: 2.0Profit: 6.0Value: 6.3Quality: 7.0
Piotroski: 5/9Altman Z: 2.26

TUSK

Hold

42

out of 100

Grade: D

Growth: 5.3Profit: 2.5Value: 4.0Quality: 6.0
Piotroski: 3/9Altman Z: 1.10
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

Intrinsic value data unavailable for AGCO.

TUSKSignificantly Overvalued (-88.2%)

Margin of Safety

-88.2%

Fair Value

$1.27

Current Price

$3.10

$1.83 premium

UndervaluedFair: $1.27Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

AGCO3 strengths · Avg: 8.7/10
Debt/EquityHealth
0.0310/10

Conservative balance sheet, low leverage

P/E RatioValuation
17.6x8/10

Attractively priced relative to earnings

Price/BookValuation
2.1x8/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

TUSK3 strengths · Avg: 10.0/10
Price/BookValuation
0.6x10/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

Revenue GrowthGrowth
110.9%10/10

Revenue surging 110.9% year-over-year

Debt/EquityHealth
0.0210/10

Conservative balance sheet, low leverage

Areas to Watch

AGCO3 concerns · Avg: 2.3/10
Profit MarginProfitability
5.2%3/10

5.2% margin — thin

Revenue GrowthGrowth
-1.0%2/10

Revenue declined 1.0%

EPS GrowthGrowth
-74.4%2/10

Earnings declined 74.4%

TUSK4 concerns · Avg: 3.3/10
EPS GrowthGrowth
0.0%4/10

0.0% earnings growth

Market CapQuality
$150.16M3/10

Smaller company, higher risk/reward

Profit MarginProfitability
1.0%3/10

1.0% margin — thin

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
3/93/10

Weak financial health signals

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : AGCO

The strongest argument for AGCO centers on Debt/Equity, P/E Ratio, Price/Book. PEG of 1.06 suggests the stock is reasonably priced for its growth.

Bull Case : TUSK

The strongest argument for TUSK centers on Price/Book, Revenue Growth, Debt/Equity. Revenue growth of 110.9% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bear Case : AGCO

The primary concerns for AGCO are Profit Margin, Revenue Growth, EPS Growth.

Bear Case : TUSK

The primary concerns for TUSK are EPS Growth, Market Cap, Profit Margin. Thin 1.0% margins leave little buffer for downturns.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

AGCO profiles as a value stock while TUSK is a hypergrowth play — different risk/reward profiles.

TUSK carries more volatility with a beta of 1.18 — expect wider price swings.

TUSK is growing revenue faster at 110.9% — sustainability is the question.

AGCO generates stronger free cash flow (108M), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

AGCO scores higher overall (52/100 vs 42/100). Both earn "Buy" and "Hold" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

AGCO Corporation

INDUSTRIALS · FARM & HEAVY CONSTRUCTION MACHINERY · USA

AGCO Corporation manufactures and distributes agricultural equipment and related spare parts worldwide. The company is headquartered in Duluth, Georgia.

Visit Website →

Mammoth Energy Services Inc

INDUSTRIALS · CONGLOMERATES · USA

Mammoth Energy Services, Inc. is an oilfield services company. The company is headquartered in Oklahoma City, Oklahoma.

Visit Website →

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?