WallStSmart

Oshkosh Corporation (OSK)vsMammoth Energy Services Inc (TUSK)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Oshkosh Corporation generates 15413% more annual revenue ($10.61B vs $68.39M). OSK leads profitability with a 5.2% profit margin vs 1.0%. OSK earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 50/100 (D+).

OSK

Hold

50

out of 100

Grade: D+

Growth: 4.0Profit: 5.5Value: 5.0Quality: 7.0
Piotroski: 3/9Altman Z: 2.82

TUSK

Hold

42

out of 100

Grade: D

Growth: 5.3Profit: 2.5Value: 4.0Quality: 6.0
Piotroski: 3/9Altman Z: 1.10
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

Intrinsic value data unavailable for OSK.

TUSKSignificantly Overvalued (-88.2%)

Margin of Safety

-88.2%

Fair Value

$1.27

Current Price

$3.10

$1.83 premium

UndervaluedFair: $1.27Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

OSK3 strengths · Avg: 8.3/10
Debt/EquityHealth
0.249/10

Conservative balance sheet, low leverage

P/E RatioValuation
17.6x8/10

Attractively priced relative to earnings

Price/BookValuation
2.0x8/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

TUSK3 strengths · Avg: 10.0/10
Price/BookValuation
0.6x10/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

Revenue GrowthGrowth
110.9%10/10

Revenue surging 110.9% year-over-year

Debt/EquityHealth
0.0210/10

Conservative balance sheet, low leverage

Areas to Watch

OSK4 concerns · Avg: 2.5/10
Profit MarginProfitability
5.2%3/10

5.2% margin — thin

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
3/93/10

Weak financial health signals

PEG RatioValuation
6.512/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

EPS GrowthGrowth
-7.6%2/10

Earnings declined 7.6%

TUSK4 concerns · Avg: 3.3/10
EPS GrowthGrowth
0.0%4/10

0.0% earnings growth

Market CapQuality
$150.16M3/10

Smaller company, higher risk/reward

Profit MarginProfitability
1.0%3/10

1.0% margin — thin

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
3/93/10

Weak financial health signals

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : OSK

The strongest argument for OSK centers on Debt/Equity, P/E Ratio, Price/Book.

Bull Case : TUSK

The strongest argument for TUSK centers on Price/Book, Revenue Growth, Debt/Equity. Revenue growth of 110.9% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bear Case : OSK

The primary concerns for OSK are Profit Margin, Piotroski F-Score, PEG Ratio.

Bear Case : TUSK

The primary concerns for TUSK are EPS Growth, Market Cap, Profit Margin. Thin 1.0% margins leave little buffer for downturns.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

OSK profiles as a value stock while TUSK is a hypergrowth play — different risk/reward profiles.

OSK carries more volatility with a beta of 1.26 — expect wider price swings.

TUSK is growing revenue faster at 110.9% — sustainability is the question.

OSK generates stronger free cash flow (349M), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

OSK scores higher overall (50/100 vs 42/100). Both earn "Hold" and "Hold" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Oshkosh Corporation

INDUSTRIALS · FARM & HEAVY CONSTRUCTION MACHINERY · USA

Oshkosh Corporation designs, manufactures and markets specialty vehicles and bodies worldwide. The company is headquartered in Oshkosh, Wisconsin.

Mammoth Energy Services Inc

INDUSTRIALS · CONGLOMERATES · USA

Mammoth Energy Services, Inc. is an oilfield services company. The company is headquartered in Oklahoma City, Oklahoma.

Visit Website →

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?