WallStSmart

CNH Industrial N.V. (CNH)vsMammoth Energy Services Inc (TUSK)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

CNH Industrial N.V. generates 26489% more annual revenue ($18.19B vs $68.39M). CNH leads profitability with a 1.7% profit margin vs 1.0%. CNH earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 49/100 (D+).

CNH

Hold

49

out of 100

Grade: D+

Growth: 2.7Profit: 4.5Value: 5.7Quality: 5.5
Piotroski: 3/9Altman Z: 1.56

TUSK

Hold

42

out of 100

Grade: D

Growth: 5.3Profit: 2.5Value: 4.0Quality: 6.0
Piotroski: 3/9Altman Z: 1.10
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

Intrinsic value data unavailable for CNH.

TUSKSignificantly Overvalued (-88.2%)

Margin of Safety

-88.2%

Fair Value

$1.27

Current Price

$3.10

$1.83 premium

UndervaluedFair: $1.27Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

CNH2 strengths · Avg: 9.0/10
PEG RatioValuation
0.3810/10

Growing faster than its price suggests

Price/BookValuation
2.2x8/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

TUSK3 strengths · Avg: 10.0/10
Price/BookValuation
0.6x10/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

Revenue GrowthGrowth
110.9%10/10

Revenue surging 110.9% year-over-year

Debt/EquityHealth
0.0210/10

Conservative balance sheet, low leverage

Areas to Watch

CNH4 concerns · Avg: 3.5/10
Revenue GrowthGrowth
2.0%4/10

2.0% revenue growth

Altman Z-ScoreHealth
1.564/10

Distress zone — elevated risk

Return on EquityProfitability
4.0%3/10

ROE of 4.0% — below average capital efficiency

Profit MarginProfitability
1.7%3/10

1.7% margin — thin

TUSK4 concerns · Avg: 3.3/10
EPS GrowthGrowth
0.0%4/10

0.0% earnings growth

Market CapQuality
$150.16M3/10

Smaller company, higher risk/reward

Profit MarginProfitability
1.0%3/10

1.0% margin — thin

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
3/93/10

Weak financial health signals

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : CNH

The strongest argument for CNH centers on PEG Ratio, Price/Book. PEG of 0.38 suggests the stock is reasonably priced for its growth.

Bull Case : TUSK

The strongest argument for TUSK centers on Price/Book, Revenue Growth, Debt/Equity. Revenue growth of 110.9% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bear Case : CNH

The primary concerns for CNH are Revenue Growth, Altman Z-Score, Return on Equity. A P/E of 57.6x leaves little room for execution misses. Debt-to-equity of 3.39 is elevated, increasing financial risk.

Bear Case : TUSK

The primary concerns for TUSK are EPS Growth, Market Cap, Profit Margin. Thin 1.0% margins leave little buffer for downturns.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

CNH profiles as a value stock while TUSK is a hypergrowth play — different risk/reward profiles.

CNH carries more volatility with a beta of 1.24 — expect wider price swings.

TUSK is growing revenue faster at 110.9% — sustainability is the question.

TUSK generates stronger free cash flow (-51M), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

CNH scores higher overall (49/100 vs 42/100). Both earn "Hold" and "Hold" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

CNH Industrial N.V.

INDUSTRIALS · FARM & HEAVY CONSTRUCTION MACHINERY · USA

CNH Industrial N.V., an equipment and services company, engages in the design, production, marketing, sale, and financing of agricultural and construction equipment in North America, Europe, the Middle East, Africa, South America, and the Asia Pacific. The company is headquartered in Basildon, the United Kingdom.

Mammoth Energy Services Inc

INDUSTRIALS · CONGLOMERATES · USA

Mammoth Energy Services, Inc. is an oilfield services company. The company is headquartered in Oklahoma City, Oklahoma.

Visit Website →

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?