WallStSmart

Ardmore Shpng (ASC)vsDanaos Corporation (DAC)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Danaos Corporation generates 186% more annual revenue ($1.06B vs $368.29M). DAC leads profitability with a 51.3% profit margin vs 29.7%. DAC trades at a lower P/E of 5.2x. ASC earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 76/100 (B+).

ASC

Strong Buy

76

out of 100

Grade: B+

Growth: 7.3Profit: 9.0Value: 8.3Quality: 8.5
Piotroski: 3/9Altman Z: 3.52

DAC

Strong Buy

71

out of 100

Grade: B

Growth: 5.3Profit: 8.0Value: 8.3Quality: 8.5
Piotroski: 3/9Altman Z: 3.39
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

ASCUndervalued (+44.1%)

Margin of Safety

+44.1%

Fair Value

$24.30

Current Price

$18.67

$5.63 discount

UndervaluedFair: $24.30Overvalued

Intrinsic value data unavailable for DAC.

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

ASC6 strengths · Avg: 10.0/10
P/E RatioValuation
7.3x10/10

Attractively priced relative to earnings

Price/BookValuation
1.1x10/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

Operating MarginProfitability
42.8%10/10

Strong operational efficiency at 42.8%

Revenue GrowthGrowth
61.3%10/10

Revenue surging 61.3% year-over-year

EPS GrowthGrowth
573.0%10/10

Earnings expanding 573.0% YoY

Debt/EquityHealth
0.0510/10

Conservative balance sheet, low leverage

DAC6 strengths · Avg: 10.0/10
PEG RatioValuation
0.1210/10

Growing faster than its price suggests

P/E RatioValuation
5.2x10/10

Attractively priced relative to earnings

Price/BookValuation
0.7x10/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

Profit MarginProfitability
51.3%10/10

Keeps 51 of every $100 in revenue as profit

Operating MarginProfitability
48.4%10/10

Strong operational efficiency at 48.4%

Altman Z-ScoreHealth
3.3910/10

Safe zone — low bankruptcy risk

Areas to Watch

ASC2 concerns · Avg: 3.0/10
Market CapQuality
$762.70M3/10

Smaller company, higher risk/reward

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
3/93/10

Weak financial health signals

DAC2 concerns · Avg: 3.5/10
Revenue GrowthGrowth
4.7%4/10

4.7% revenue growth

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
3/93/10

Weak financial health signals

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : ASC

The strongest argument for ASC centers on P/E Ratio, Price/Book, Operating Margin. Profitability is solid with margins at 29.7% and operating margin at 42.8%. Revenue growth of 61.3% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bull Case : DAC

The strongest argument for DAC centers on PEG Ratio, P/E Ratio, Price/Book. Profitability is solid with margins at 51.3% and operating margin at 48.4%. PEG of 0.12 suggests the stock is reasonably priced for its growth.

Bear Case : ASC

The primary concerns for ASC are Market Cap, Piotroski F-Score.

Bear Case : DAC

The primary concerns for DAC are Revenue Growth, Piotroski F-Score.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

ASC profiles as a growth stock while DAC is a value play — different risk/reward profiles.

DAC carries more volatility with a beta of 0.86 — expect wider price swings.

ASC is growing revenue faster at 61.3% — sustainability is the question.

ASC generates stronger free cash flow (51M), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

ASC scores higher overall (76/100 vs 71/100), backed by strong 29.7% margins and 61.3% revenue growth. Both earn "Strong Buy" and "Strong Buy" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Ardmore Shpng

INDUSTRIALS · MARINE SHIPPING · USA

Ardmore Shipping Corporation is engaged in the global shipping of chemicals and petroleum products. The company is headquartered in Pembroke, Bermuda.

Visit Website →

Danaos Corporation

INDUSTRIALS · MARINE SHIPPING · USA

Danaos Corporation owns and operates container ships in Australia, Asia, Europe and the United States. The company is headquartered in Piraeus, Greece.

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?