WallStSmart

American States Water Company (AWR)vsCalifornia Water Service Group (CWT)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

California Water Service Group generates 55% more annual revenue ($1.05B vs $679.25M). AWR leads profitability with a 19.7% profit margin vs 12.6%. CWT appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 2.22. CWT earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 67/100 (B-).

AWR

Buy

60

out of 100

Grade: C

Growth: 6.7Profit: 7.5Value: 4.0Quality: 5.0
Piotroski: 4/9Altman Z: 1.23

CWT

Strong Buy

67

out of 100

Grade: B-

Growth: 8.0Profit: 6.0Value: 6.0Quality: 3.5
Piotroski: 2/9Altman Z: 0.72
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

AWROvervalued (-11.0%)

Margin of Safety

-11.0%

Fair Value

$63.92

Current Price

$87.39

$23.47 premium

UndervaluedFair: $63.92Overvalued
CWTUndervalued (+21.7%)

Margin of Safety

+21.7%

Fair Value

$56.40

Current Price

$50.53

$5.87 discount

UndervaluedFair: $56.40Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

AWR1 strengths · Avg: 10.0/10
Operating MarginProfitability
30.9%10/10

Strong operational efficiency at 30.9%

CWT4 strengths · Avg: 8.0/10
Price/BookValuation
1.7x8/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

Operating MarginProfitability
28.2%8/10

Strong operational efficiency at 28.2%

Revenue GrowthGrowth
16.5%8/10

16.5% revenue growth

EPS GrowthGrowth
31.4%8/10

Earnings expanding 31.4% YoY

Areas to Watch

AWR2 concerns · Avg: 2.0/10
PEG RatioValuation
2.982/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

Altman Z-ScoreHealth
1.232/10

Distress zone — elevated risk

CWT4 concerns · Avg: 3.0/10
PEG RatioValuation
2.224/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

Return on EquityProfitability
6.7%3/10

ROE of 6.7% — below average capital efficiency

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
2/93/10

Weak financial health signals

Free Cash FlowQuality
$-80.07M2/10

Negative free cash flow — burning cash

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : AWR

The strongest argument for AWR centers on Operating Margin. Profitability is solid with margins at 19.7% and operating margin at 30.9%. Revenue growth of 14.3% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bull Case : CWT

The strongest argument for CWT centers on Price/Book, Operating Margin, Revenue Growth. Revenue growth of 16.5% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bear Case : AWR

The primary concerns for AWR are PEG Ratio, Altman Z-Score.

Bear Case : CWT

The primary concerns for CWT are PEG Ratio, Return on Equity, Piotroski F-Score.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

AWR profiles as a mature stock while CWT is a growth play — different risk/reward profiles.

AWR carries more volatility with a beta of 0.58 — expect wider price swings.

CWT is growing revenue faster at 16.5% — sustainability is the question.

AWR generates stronger free cash flow (23M), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

CWT scores higher overall (67/100 vs 60/100) and 16.5% revenue growth. Both earn "Strong Buy" and "Buy" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

American States Water Company

UTILITIES · UTILITIES - REGULATED WATER · USA

American States Water Company provides water and electricity services to residential, commercial, industrial and other customers in the United States. The company is headquartered in San Dimas, California.

Visit Website →

California Water Service Group

UTILITIES · UTILITIES - REGULATED WATER · USA

California Water Service Group provides public water and related services in California, Washington, New Mexico and Hawaii. The company is headquartered in San Jose, California.

Visit Website →

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?