WallStSmart

California Water Service Group (CWT)vsH2O America (HTO)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

California Water Service Group generates 25% more annual revenue ($1.00B vs $800.59M). HTO leads profitability with a 12.8% profit margin vs 12.8%. CWT appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 2.00. HTO earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 49/100 (D+).

CWT

Hold

47

out of 100

Grade: D+

Growth: 3.3Profit: 5.0Value: 7.3Quality: 2.8
Piotroski: 1/9Altman Z: 0.74

HTO

Hold

49

out of 100

Grade: D+

Growth: 3.3Profit: 5.5Value: 7.3Quality: 5.0
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

CWTSignificantly Overvalued (-202.0%)

Margin of Safety

-202.0%

Fair Value

$14.62

Current Price

$43.94

$29.32 premium

UndervaluedFair: $14.62Overvalued
HTOSignificantly Overvalued (-161.7%)

Margin of Safety

-161.7%

Fair Value

$19.86

Current Price

$56.72

$36.86 premium

UndervaluedFair: $19.86Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

CWT1 strengths · Avg: 8.0/10
Price/BookValuation
1.6x8/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

HTO1 strengths · Avg: 10.0/10
Price/BookValuation
1.3x10/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

Areas to Watch

CWT4 concerns · Avg: 3.0/10
PEG RatioValuation
2.004/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

Return on EquityProfitability
7.7%3/10

ROE of 7.7% — below average capital efficiency

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
1/93/10

Weak financial health signals

Revenue GrowthGrowth
-100.0%2/10

Revenue declined 100.0%

HTO4 concerns · Avg: 2.8/10
PEG RatioValuation
2.494/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

Return on EquityProfitability
7.1%3/10

ROE of 7.1% — below average capital efficiency

Revenue GrowthGrowth
-1.8%2/10

Revenue declined 1.8%

EPS GrowthGrowth
-34.4%2/10

Earnings declined 34.4%

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : CWT

The strongest argument for CWT centers on Price/Book.

Bull Case : HTO

The strongest argument for HTO centers on Price/Book.

Bear Case : CWT

The primary concerns for CWT are PEG Ratio, Return on Equity, Piotroski F-Score.

Bear Case : HTO

The primary concerns for HTO are PEG Ratio, Return on Equity, Revenue Growth.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

CWT carries more volatility with a beta of 0.63 — expect wider price swings.

HTO is growing revenue faster at -1.8% — sustainability is the question.

CWT generates stronger free cash flow (-104M), providing more financial flexibility.

Monitor UTILITIES - REGULATED WATER industry trends, competitive dynamics, and regulatory changes.

Bottom Line

HTO scores higher overall (49/100 vs 47/100). Both earn "Hold" and "Hold" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

California Water Service Group

UTILITIES · UTILITIES - REGULATED WATER · USA

California Water Service Group provides public water and related services in California, Washington, New Mexico and Hawaii. The company is headquartered in San Jose, California.

Visit Website →

H2O America

UTILITIES · UTILITIES - REGULATED WATER · USA

H2O America, provides water utility and other related services in the United States. The company is headquartered in San Jose, California.

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?