WallStSmart

California Water Service Group (CWT)vsH2O America (HTO)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

California Water Service Group generates 27% more annual revenue ($1.05B vs $828.50M). HTO leads profitability with a 12.9% profit margin vs 12.6%. CWT appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 2.22. CWT earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 67/100 (B-).

CWT

Strong Buy

67

out of 100

Grade: B-

Growth: 8.0Profit: 6.0Value: 6.0Quality: 3.5
Piotroski: 2/9Altman Z: 0.72

HTO

Buy

55

out of 100

Grade: C

Growth: 4.7Profit: 5.5Value: 6.0Quality: 4.0
Piotroski: 1/9Altman Z: 0.68
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

CWTUndervalued (+21.7%)

Margin of Safety

+21.7%

Fair Value

$56.40

Current Price

$50.53

$5.87 discount

UndervaluedFair: $56.40Overvalued
HTOUndervalued (+30.1%)

Margin of Safety

+30.1%

Fair Value

$74.38

Current Price

$62.66

$11.72 discount

UndervaluedFair: $74.38Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

CWT4 strengths · Avg: 8.0/10
Price/BookValuation
1.7x8/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

Operating MarginProfitability
28.2%8/10

Strong operational efficiency at 28.2%

Revenue GrowthGrowth
16.5%8/10

16.5% revenue growth

EPS GrowthGrowth
31.4%8/10

Earnings expanding 31.4% YoY

HTO2 strengths · Avg: 9.0/10
Price/BookValuation
1.4x10/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

Operating MarginProfitability
21.3%8/10

Strong operational efficiency at 21.3%

Areas to Watch

CWT4 concerns · Avg: 3.0/10
PEG RatioValuation
2.224/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

Return on EquityProfitability
6.7%3/10

ROE of 6.7% — below average capital efficiency

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
2/93/10

Weak financial health signals

Free Cash FlowQuality
$-80.07M2/10

Negative free cash flow — burning cash

HTO4 concerns · Avg: 2.8/10
Return on EquityProfitability
6.5%3/10

ROE of 6.5% — below average capital efficiency

Debt/EquityHealth
1.023/10

Elevated debt levels

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
1/93/10

Weak financial health signals

PEG RatioValuation
2.682/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : CWT

The strongest argument for CWT centers on Price/Book, Operating Margin, Revenue Growth. Revenue growth of 16.5% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bull Case : HTO

The strongest argument for HTO centers on Price/Book, Operating Margin.

Bear Case : CWT

The primary concerns for CWT are PEG Ratio, Return on Equity, Piotroski F-Score.

Bear Case : HTO

The primary concerns for HTO are Return on Equity, Debt/Equity, Piotroski F-Score.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

CWT profiles as a growth stock while HTO is a value play — different risk/reward profiles.

CWT carries more volatility with a beta of 0.51 — expect wider price swings.

CWT is growing revenue faster at 16.5% — sustainability is the question.

HTO generates stronger free cash flow (-49M), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

CWT scores higher overall (67/100 vs 55/100) and 16.5% revenue growth. HTO offers better value entry with a 30.1% margin of safety. Both earn "Strong Buy" and "Buy" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

California Water Service Group

UTILITIES · UTILITIES - REGULATED WATER · USA

California Water Service Group provides public water and related services in California, Washington, New Mexico and Hawaii. The company is headquartered in San Jose, California.

Visit Website →

H2O America

UTILITIES · UTILITIES - REGULATED WATER · USA

H2O America, provides water utility and other related services in the United States. The company is headquartered in San Jose, California.

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?