WallStSmart

Braskem SA Class A (BAK)vsCelanese Corporation (CE)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Braskem SA Class A generates 603% more annual revenue ($66.75B vs $9.49B). CE leads profitability with a -11.6% profit margin vs -13.7%. BAK appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 1.46. CE earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 47/100 (D+).

BAK

Hold

38

out of 100

Grade: F

Growth: 4.7Profit: 2.5Value: 5.3Quality: 4.5
Piotroski: 3/9Altman Z: 0.13

CE

Hold

47

out of 100

Grade: D+

Growth: 4.0Profit: 3.5Value: 5.0Quality: 3.5
Piotroski: 3/9Altman Z: 1.28
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

Intrinsic value data unavailable for BAK.

CEUndervalued (+29.1%)

Margin of Safety

+29.1%

Fair Value

$85.47

Current Price

$51.03

$34.44 discount

UndervaluedFair: $85.47Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

BAK2 strengths · Avg: 10.0/10
EPS GrowthGrowth
107.2%10/10

Earnings expanding 107.2% YoY

Debt/EquityHealth
-4.3010/10

Conservative balance sheet, low leverage

CE2 strengths · Avg: 9.0/10
Price/BookValuation
1.4x10/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

EPS GrowthGrowth
28.2%8/10

Earnings expanding 28.2% YoY

Areas to Watch

BAK4 concerns · Avg: 2.5/10
Market CapQuality
$1.66B3/10

Smaller company, higher risk/reward

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
3/93/10

Weak financial health signals

Return on EquityProfitability
-549.0%2/10

ROE of -549.0% — below average capital efficiency

Revenue GrowthGrowth
-20.4%2/10

Revenue declined 20.4%

CE4 concerns · Avg: 2.3/10
Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
3/93/10

Weak financial health signals

PEG RatioValuation
4.422/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

Return on EquityProfitability
-26.9%2/10

ROE of -26.9% — below average capital efficiency

Revenue GrowthGrowth
-2.2%2/10

Revenue declined 2.2%

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : BAK

The strongest argument for BAK centers on EPS Growth, Debt/Equity. PEG of 1.46 suggests the stock is reasonably priced for its growth.

Bull Case : CE

The strongest argument for CE centers on Price/Book, EPS Growth.

Bear Case : BAK

The primary concerns for BAK are Market Cap, Piotroski F-Score, Return on Equity.

Bear Case : CE

The primary concerns for CE are Piotroski F-Score, PEG Ratio, Return on Equity. Debt-to-equity of 3.09 is elevated, increasing financial risk.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

CE carries more volatility with a beta of 0.74 — expect wider price swings.

CE is growing revenue faster at -2.2% — sustainability is the question.

CE generates stronger free cash flow (10M), providing more financial flexibility.

Monitor CHEMICALS industry trends, competitive dynamics, and regulatory changes.

Bottom Line

CE scores higher overall (47/100 vs 38/100). Both earn "Hold" and "Hold" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Braskem SA Class A

BASIC MATERIALS · CHEMICALS · USA

Braskem SA produces and markets thermoplastic resins. The company is headquartered in Camaari, Brazil.

Celanese Corporation

BASIC MATERIALS · CHEMICALS · USA

Celanese Corporation is a Fortune 500 global technology and specialty materials company headquartered in Irving, Texas, United States.

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?