WallStSmart

Braskem SA Class A (BAK)vsHuntsman Corporation (HUN)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Braskem SA Class A generates 1072% more annual revenue ($66.75B vs $5.69B). HUN leads profitability with a -5.8% profit margin vs -13.7%. BAK appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 1.46. HUN earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 49/100 (D+).

BAK

Hold

38

out of 100

Grade: F

Growth: 4.7Profit: 2.5Value: 5.3Quality: 4.5
Piotroski: 3/9Altman Z: 0.13

HUN

Hold

49

out of 100

Grade: D+

Growth: 4.7Profit: 2.0Value: 3.7Quality: 4.5
Piotroski: 1/9Altman Z: 1.67
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

Intrinsic value data unavailable for BAK.

HUNSignificantly Overvalued (-22.6%)

Margin of Safety

-22.6%

Fair Value

$11.47

Current Price

$14.21

$2.74 premium

UndervaluedFair: $11.47Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

BAK2 strengths · Avg: 10.0/10
EPS GrowthGrowth
107.2%10/10

Earnings expanding 107.2% YoY

Debt/EquityHealth
-4.3010/10

Conservative balance sheet, low leverage

HUN2 strengths · Avg: 9.0/10
Price/BookValuation
0.9x10/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

EPS GrowthGrowth
20.6%8/10

Earnings expanding 20.6% YoY

Areas to Watch

BAK4 concerns · Avg: 2.5/10
Market CapQuality
$1.66B3/10

Smaller company, higher risk/reward

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
3/93/10

Weak financial health signals

Return on EquityProfitability
-549.0%2/10

ROE of -549.0% — below average capital efficiency

Revenue GrowthGrowth
-20.4%2/10

Revenue declined 20.4%

HUN4 concerns · Avg: 3.8/10
PEG RatioValuation
2.224/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

Revenue GrowthGrowth
0.7%4/10

0.7% revenue growth

Altman Z-ScoreHealth
1.674/10

Distress zone — elevated risk

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
1/93/10

Weak financial health signals

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : BAK

The strongest argument for BAK centers on EPS Growth, Debt/Equity. PEG of 1.46 suggests the stock is reasonably priced for its growth.

Bull Case : HUN

The strongest argument for HUN centers on Price/Book, EPS Growth.

Bear Case : BAK

The primary concerns for BAK are Market Cap, Piotroski F-Score, Return on Equity.

Bear Case : HUN

The primary concerns for HUN are PEG Ratio, Revenue Growth, Altman Z-Score.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

HUN carries more volatility with a beta of 0.64 — expect wider price swings.

HUN is growing revenue faster at 0.7% — sustainability is the question.

HUN generates stronger free cash flow (-91M), providing more financial flexibility.

Monitor CHEMICALS industry trends, competitive dynamics, and regulatory changes.

Bottom Line

HUN scores higher overall (49/100 vs 38/100). Both earn "Hold" and "Hold" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Braskem SA Class A

BASIC MATERIALS · CHEMICALS · USA

Braskem SA produces and markets thermoplastic resins. The company is headquartered in Camaari, Brazil.

Huntsman Corporation

BASIC MATERIALS · CHEMICALS · USA

Huntsman Corporation manufactures and sells differentiated organic chemicals globally. The company is headquartered in The Woodlands, Texas.

Visit Website →

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?