WallStSmart

BorgWarner Inc (BWA)vsDana Inc (DAN)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

BorgWarner Inc generates 89% more annual revenue ($14.33B vs $7.59B). DAN leads profitability with a 15.1% profit margin vs 2.5%. BWA appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 0.64. BWA earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 61/100 (C+).

BWA

Buy

61

out of 100

Grade: C+

Growth: 6.0Profit: 5.0Value: 7.3Quality: 7.0
Piotroski: 5/9Altman Z: 2.58

DAN

Buy

58

out of 100

Grade: C

Growth: 5.3Profit: 4.5Value: 4.0Quality: 5.0
Piotroski: 3/9Altman Z: 1.25
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

BWAUndervalued (+31.1%)

Margin of Safety

+31.1%

Fair Value

$104.30

Current Price

$77.03

$27.27 discount

UndervaluedFair: $104.30Overvalued

Intrinsic value data unavailable for DAN.

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

BWA3 strengths · Avg: 8.7/10
EPS GrowthGrowth
61.1%10/10

Earnings expanding 61.1% YoY

PEG RatioValuation
0.648/10

Growing faster than its price suggests

Price/BookValuation
2.9x8/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

DAN2 strengths · Avg: 9.0/10
EPS GrowthGrowth
5660.0%10/10

Earnings expanding 5660.0% YoY

Price/BookValuation
2.0x8/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

Areas to Watch

BWA4 concerns · Avg: 3.0/10
Revenue GrowthGrowth
0.5%4/10

0.5% revenue growth

Return on EquityProfitability
6.6%3/10

ROE of 6.6% — below average capital efficiency

Profit MarginProfitability
2.5%3/10

2.5% margin — thin

P/E RatioValuation
43.3x2/10

Premium valuation, high expectations priced in

DAN4 concerns · Avg: 3.0/10
Revenue GrowthGrowth
4.9%4/10

4.9% revenue growth

Operating MarginProfitability
3.4%3/10

Operating margin of 3.4%

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
3/93/10

Weak financial health signals

PEG RatioValuation
6.852/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : BWA

The strongest argument for BWA centers on EPS Growth, PEG Ratio, Price/Book. PEG of 0.64 suggests the stock is reasonably priced for its growth.

Bull Case : DAN

The strongest argument for DAN centers on EPS Growth, Price/Book. Profitability is solid with margins at 15.1% and operating margin at 3.4%.

Bear Case : BWA

The primary concerns for BWA are Revenue Growth, Return on Equity, Profit Margin. A P/E of 43.3x leaves little room for execution misses. Thin 2.5% margins leave little buffer for downturns.

Bear Case : DAN

The primary concerns for DAN are Revenue Growth, Operating Margin, Piotroski F-Score.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

DAN carries more volatility with a beta of 1.94 — expect wider price swings.

DAN is growing revenue faster at 4.9% — sustainability is the question.

BWA generates stronger free cash flow (9M), providing more financial flexibility.

Monitor AUTO PARTS industry trends, competitive dynamics, and regulatory changes.

Bottom Line

BWA scores higher overall (61/100 vs 58/100). Both earn "Buy" and "Buy" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

BorgWarner Inc

CONSUMER CYCLICAL · AUTO PARTS · USA

BorgWarner Inc. is an American multinational automotive supplier headquartered in Auburn Hills, Michigan.

Visit Website →

Dana Inc

CONSUMER CYCLICAL · AUTO PARTS · USA

Dana Incorporated provides energy management and energy transportation solutions for vehicles and machinery in North America, Europe, South America, and Asia Pacific. The company is headquartered in Maumee, Ohio.

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?