WallStSmart

Civitas Resources Inc (CIVI)vsDiamondback Energy Inc (FANG)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Diamondback Energy Inc generates 207% more annual revenue ($14.46B vs $4.71B). FANG leads profitability with a 2.0% profit margin vs 0.1%. CIVI appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 2.17. CIVI earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 61/100 (C+).

CIVI

Buy

61

out of 100

Grade: C+

Growth: 4.7Profit: 4.0Value: 6.3Quality: 4.3
Piotroski: 4/9Altman Z: 1.21

FANG

Hold

41

out of 100

Grade: D

Growth: 4.7Profit: 4.0Value: 4.7Quality: 4.5
Piotroski: 2/9Altman Z: 1.28
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

Intrinsic value data unavailable for CIVI.

FANGUndervalued (+41.1%)

Margin of Safety

+41.1%

Fair Value

$286.80

Current Price

$192.62

$94.18 discount

UndervaluedFair: $286.80Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

CIVI2 strengths · Avg: 10.0/10
P/E RatioValuation
4.0x10/10

Attractively priced relative to earnings

Price/BookValuation
0.3x10/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

FANG2 strengths · Avg: 9.5/10
Price/BookValuation
1.5x10/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

Market CapQuality
$56.94B9/10

Large-cap with strong market position

Areas to Watch

CIVI4 concerns · Avg: 3.3/10
PEG RatioValuation
2.174/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

Return on EquityProfitability
0.1%3/10

ROE of 0.1% — below average capital efficiency

Profit MarginProfitability
0.1%3/10

0.1% margin — thin

Operating MarginProfitability
0.3%3/10

Operating margin of 0.3%

FANG4 concerns · Avg: 3.3/10
Revenue GrowthGrowth
4.2%4/10

4.2% revenue growth

Return on EquityProfitability
1.1%3/10

ROE of 1.1% — below average capital efficiency

Profit MarginProfitability
2.0%3/10

2.0% margin — thin

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
2/93/10

Weak financial health signals

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : CIVI

The strongest argument for CIVI centers on P/E Ratio, Price/Book.

Bull Case : FANG

The strongest argument for FANG centers on Price/Book, Market Cap.

Bear Case : CIVI

The primary concerns for CIVI are PEG Ratio, Return on Equity, Profit Margin. Thin 0.1% margins leave little buffer for downturns.

Bear Case : FANG

The primary concerns for FANG are Revenue Growth, Return on Equity, Profit Margin. A P/E of 208.7x leaves little room for execution misses. Thin 2.0% margins leave little buffer for downturns.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

CIVI carries more volatility with a beta of 0.92 — expect wider price swings.

FANG is growing revenue faster at 4.2% — sustainability is the question.

FANG generates stronger free cash flow (895M), providing more financial flexibility.

Monitor OIL & GAS E&P industry trends, competitive dynamics, and regulatory changes.

Bottom Line

CIVI scores higher overall (61/100 vs 41/100). FANG offers better value entry with a 41.1% margin of safety. Both earn "Buy" and "Hold" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Civitas Resources Inc

ENERGY · OIL & GAS E&P · USA

Civitas Solutions, Inc. provides health and human services in the home and community to individuals who must care for individuals with intellectual, developmental, behavioral, and / or medically complex challenges in the United States.

Diamondback Energy Inc

ENERGY · OIL & GAS E&P · USA

Diamondback Energy is a company engaged in hydrocarbon exploration and headquartered in Midland, Texas.

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?