WallStSmart

ConocoPhillips (COP)vsDiamondback Energy Inc (FANG)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

ConocoPhillips generates 315% more annual revenue ($59.38B vs $14.29B). COP leads profitability with a 12.3% profit margin vs 11.6%. COP appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 1.22. COP earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 56/100 (C).

COP

Buy

56

out of 100

Grade: C

Growth: 2.0Profit: 6.5Value: 4.7Quality: 5.0

FANG

Hold

43

out of 100

Grade: D

Growth: 5.3Profit: 4.0Value: 5.3Quality: 3.3
Piotroski: 1/9Altman Z: 1.24
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

COPSignificantly Overvalued (-50.9%)

Margin of Safety

-50.9%

Fair Value

$73.68

Current Price

$124.91

$51.23 premium

UndervaluedFair: $73.68Overvalued
FANGUndervalued (+44.1%)

Margin of Safety

+44.1%

Fair Value

$302.54

Current Price

$206.18

$96.36 discount

UndervaluedFair: $302.54Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

COP4 strengths · Avg: 8.3/10
Market CapQuality
$152.18B9/10

Large-cap with strong market position

Price/BookValuation
2.4x8/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

Operating MarginProfitability
22.1%8/10

Strong operational efficiency at 22.1%

Free Cash FlowQuality
$1.35B8/10

Generating 1.3B in free cash flow

FANG3 strengths · Avg: 8.3/10
Market CapQuality
$60.11B9/10

Large-cap with strong market position

Price/BookValuation
1.6x8/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

Free Cash FlowQuality
$1.40B8/10

Generating 1.4B in free cash flow

Areas to Watch

COP2 concerns · Avg: 2.0/10
Revenue GrowthGrowth
-5.3%2/10

Revenue declined 5.3%

EPS GrowthGrowth
-20.2%2/10

Earnings declined 20.2%

FANG4 concerns · Avg: 3.0/10
P/E RatioValuation
36.2x4/10

Premium valuation, high expectations priced in

Return on EquityProfitability
3.7%3/10

ROE of 3.7% — below average capital efficiency

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
1/93/10

Weak financial health signals

PEG RatioValuation
55.522/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : COP

The strongest argument for COP centers on Market Cap, Price/Book, Operating Margin. PEG of 1.22 suggests the stock is reasonably priced for its growth.

Bull Case : FANG

The strongest argument for FANG centers on Market Cap, Price/Book, Free Cash Flow.

Bear Case : COP

The primary concerns for COP are Revenue Growth, EPS Growth.

Bear Case : FANG

The primary concerns for FANG are P/E Ratio, Return on Equity, Piotroski F-Score.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

FANG carries more volatility with a beta of 0.44 — expect wider price swings.

COP is growing revenue faster at -5.3% — sustainability is the question.

FANG generates stronger free cash flow (1.4B), providing more financial flexibility.

Monitor OIL & GAS E&P industry trends, competitive dynamics, and regulatory changes.

Bottom Line

COP scores higher overall (56/100 vs 43/100). FANG offers better value entry with a 44.1% margin of safety. Both earn "Buy" and "Hold" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

ConocoPhillips

ENERGY · OIL & GAS E&P · USA

ConocoPhillips is an American multinational corporation engaged in hydrocarbon exploration. It is based in the Energy Corridor district of Houston, Texas.

Diamondback Energy Inc

ENERGY · OIL & GAS E&P · USA

Diamondback Energy is a company engaged in hydrocarbon exploration and headquartered in Midland, Texas.

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?