Canadian Natural Resources Ltd (CNQ)vsDiamondback Energy Inc (FANG)
CNQ
Canadian Natural Resources Ltd
$45.70
-3.23%
ENERGY · Cap: $91.79B
FANG
Diamondback Energy Inc
$192.62
-5.09%
ENERGY · Cap: $53.44B
Smart Verdict
WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison
Canadian Natural Resources Ltd generates 167% more annual revenue ($38.63B vs $14.46B). CNQ leads profitability with a 25.1% profit margin vs 2.0%. CNQ appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 3.42. CNQ earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 58/100 (C).
CNQ
Buy58
out of 100
Grade: C
FANG
Hold41
out of 100
Grade: D
Intrinsic Value Comparison
Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula
Margin of Safety
+48.3%
Fair Value
$83.74
Current Price
$45.70
$38.04 discount
Margin of Safety
+41.1%
Fair Value
$286.80
Current Price
$192.62
$94.18 discount
Key Strengths & Concerns
Side-by-side fundamental analysis
Key Strengths
Attractively priced relative to earnings
Every $100 of equity generates 30 in profit
Large-cap with strong market position
Keeps 25 of every $100 in revenue as profit
Reasonable price relative to book value
Strong operational efficiency at 21.8%
Reasonable price relative to book value
Large-cap with strong market position
Areas to Watch
Expensive relative to growth rate
Revenue declined 1.2%
Earnings declined 45.3%
4.2% revenue growth
ROE of 1.1% — below average capital efficiency
2.0% margin — thin
Weak financial health signals
Comparative Analysis Report
WallStSmart ResearchBull Case : CNQ
The strongest argument for CNQ centers on P/E Ratio, Return on Equity, Market Cap. Profitability is solid with margins at 25.1% and operating margin at 21.8%.
Bull Case : FANG
The strongest argument for FANG centers on Price/Book, Market Cap.
Bear Case : CNQ
The primary concerns for CNQ are PEG Ratio, Revenue Growth, EPS Growth.
Bear Case : FANG
The primary concerns for FANG are Revenue Growth, Return on Equity, Profit Margin. A P/E of 191.9x leaves little room for execution misses. Thin 2.0% margins leave little buffer for downturns.
Key Dynamics to Monitor
CNQ profiles as a declining stock while FANG is a value play — different risk/reward profiles.
CNQ carries more volatility with a beta of 0.88 — expect wider price swings.
FANG is growing revenue faster at 4.2% — sustainability is the question.
FANG generates stronger free cash flow (895M), providing more financial flexibility.
Bottom Line
CNQ scores higher overall (58/100 vs 41/100), backed by strong 25.1% margins. FANG offers better value entry with a 41.1% margin of safety. Both earn "Buy" and "Hold" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.
This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.
Canadian Natural Resources Ltd
ENERGY · OIL & GAS E&P · USA
Canadian Natural Resources Limited acquires, explores, develops, produces, markets and sells crude oil, natural gas and natural gas liquids (NGL). The company is headquartered in Calgary, Canada.
Diamondback Energy Inc
ENERGY · OIL & GAS E&P · USA
Diamondback Energy is a company engaged in hydrocarbon exploration and headquartered in Midland, Texas.
Compare with Other OIL & GAS E&P Stocks
Want to dig deeper into these stocks?