WallStSmart

Colgate-Palmolive Company (CL)vsQMMM Holdings Limited Ordinary Shares (QMMM)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Colgate-Palmolive Company generates 1086187% more annual revenue ($20.38B vs $1.88M). CL leads profitability with a 10.5% profit margin vs -1.5%. CL earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 56/100 (C).

CL

Buy

56

out of 100

Grade: C

Growth: 4.7Profit: 8.5Value: 4.7Quality: 3.3
Piotroski: 3/9

QMMM

Avoid

14

out of 100

Grade: F

Growth: 2.7Profit: 2.0Value: 5.0Quality: 8.5
Piotroski: 3/9Altman Z: 4.39
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

CLSignificantly Overvalued (-279.8%)

Margin of Safety

-279.8%

Fair Value

$22.51

Current Price

$85.49

$62.98 premium

UndervaluedFair: $22.51Overvalued

Intrinsic value data unavailable for QMMM.

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

CL4 strengths · Avg: 8.8/10
Return on EquityProfitability
49.7%10/10

Every $100 of equity generates 50 in profit

Market CapQuality
$67.75B9/10

Large-cap with strong market position

Operating MarginProfitability
20.4%8/10

Strong operational efficiency at 20.4%

Free Cash FlowQuality
$1.28B8/10

Generating 1.3B in free cash flow

QMMM2 strengths · Avg: 10.0/10
Debt/EquityHealth
0.0210/10

Conservative balance sheet, low leverage

Altman Z-ScoreHealth
4.3910/10

Safe zone — low bankruptcy risk

Areas to Watch

CL4 concerns · Avg: 3.3/10
P/E RatioValuation
32.1x4/10

Premium valuation, high expectations priced in

EPS GrowthGrowth
1.1%4/10

1.1% earnings growth

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
3/93/10

Weak financial health signals

PEG RatioValuation
3.262/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

QMMM4 concerns · Avg: 2.8/10
EPS GrowthGrowth
0.0%4/10

0.0% earnings growth

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
3/93/10

Weak financial health signals

Price/BookValuation
519.1x2/10

Trading at 519.1x book value

Return on EquityProfitability
-2.0%2/10

ROE of -2.0% — below average capital efficiency

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : CL

The strongest argument for CL centers on Return on Equity, Market Cap, Operating Margin.

Bull Case : QMMM

The strongest argument for QMMM centers on Debt/Equity, Altman Z-Score.

Bear Case : CL

The primary concerns for CL are P/E Ratio, EPS Growth, Piotroski F-Score. Debt-to-equity of 147.93 is elevated, increasing financial risk.

Bear Case : QMMM

The primary concerns for QMMM are EPS Growth, Piotroski F-Score, Price/Book.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

CL profiles as a value stock while QMMM is a turnaround play — different risk/reward profiles.

CL is growing revenue faster at 5.8% — sustainability is the question.

CL generates stronger free cash flow (1.3B), providing more financial flexibility.

Monitor HOUSEHOLD & PERSONAL PRODUCTS industry trends, competitive dynamics, and regulatory changes.

Bottom Line

CL scores higher overall (56/100 vs 14/100). Both earn "Buy" and "Avoid" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Colgate-Palmolive Company

CONSUMER DEFENSIVE · HOUSEHOLD & PERSONAL PRODUCTS · USA

Colgate-Palmolive Company is an American multinational consumer products company headquartered on Park Avenue in Midtown Manhattan, New York City. It specializes in the production, distribution and provision of household, health care, personal care and veterinary products.

Visit Website →

QMMM Holdings Limited Ordinary Shares

COMMUNICATION SERVICES · ADVERTISING AGENCIES · USA

QMMM Holdings Limited, provides digital media advertising and marketing production services primarily in Hong Kong.

Visit Website →

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?