WallStSmart

Colgate-Palmolive Company (CL)vsTrane Technologies plc (TT)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Trane Technologies plc generates 4% more annual revenue ($21.60B vs $20.80B). TT leads profitability with a 13.4% profit margin vs 10.0%. CL appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 1.56. CL earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 58/100 (C).

CL

Buy

58

out of 100

Grade: C

Growth: 4.0Profit: 8.5Value: 5.3Quality: 3.3
Piotroski: 3/9

TT

Buy

52

out of 100

Grade: C-

Growth: 5.3Profit: 8.0Value: 4.3Quality: 5.5
Piotroski: 6/9
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

CLUndervalued (+17.8%)

Margin of Safety

+17.8%

Fair Value

$104.97

Current Price

$88.16

$16.81 discount

UndervaluedFair: $104.97Overvalued

Intrinsic value data unavailable for TT.

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

CL3 strengths · Avg: 9.0/10
Return on EquityProfitability
36.4%10/10

Every $100 of equity generates 36 in profit

Market CapQuality
$68.31B9/10

Large-cap with strong market position

Operating MarginProfitability
20.9%8/10

Strong operational efficiency at 20.9%

TT2 strengths · Avg: 9.5/10
Return on EquityProfitability
36.6%10/10

Every $100 of equity generates 37 in profit

Market CapQuality
$107.57B9/10

Large-cap with strong market position

Areas to Watch

CL4 concerns · Avg: 3.3/10
PEG RatioValuation
1.564/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

P/E RatioValuation
33.2x4/10

Premium valuation, high expectations priced in

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
3/93/10

Weak financial health signals

Price/BookValuation
1259.4x2/10

Trading at 1259.4x book value

TT4 concerns · Avg: 3.5/10
PEG RatioValuation
2.394/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

P/E RatioValuation
37.2x4/10

Premium valuation, high expectations priced in

Price/BookValuation
12.6x4/10

Trading at 12.6x book value

EPS GrowthGrowth
-2.1%2/10

Earnings declined 2.1%

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : CL

The strongest argument for CL centers on Return on Equity, Market Cap, Operating Margin.

Bull Case : TT

The strongest argument for TT centers on Return on Equity, Market Cap.

Bear Case : CL

The primary concerns for CL are PEG Ratio, P/E Ratio, Piotroski F-Score. Debt-to-equity of 147.93 is elevated, increasing financial risk.

Bear Case : TT

The primary concerns for TT are PEG Ratio, P/E Ratio, Price/Book.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

TT carries more volatility with a beta of 1.21 — expect wider price swings.

CL is growing revenue faster at 8.4% — sustainability is the question.

CL generates stronger free cash flow (609M), providing more financial flexibility.

Monitor HOUSEHOLD & PERSONAL PRODUCTS industry trends, competitive dynamics, and regulatory changes.

Bottom Line

CL scores higher overall (58/100 vs 52/100). Both earn "Buy" and "Buy" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Colgate-Palmolive Company

CONSUMER DEFENSIVE · HOUSEHOLD & PERSONAL PRODUCTS · USA

Colgate-Palmolive Company is an American multinational consumer products company headquartered on Park Avenue in Midtown Manhattan, New York City. It specializes in the production, distribution and provision of household, health care, personal care and veterinary products.

Visit Website →

Trane Technologies plc

INDUSTRIALS · BUILDING PRODUCTS & EQUIPMENT · USA

Trane Technologies plc is an American Irish domiciled diversified industrial manufacturing company. It is headquartered near Dublin, Ireland.

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?