WallStSmart

Colgate-Palmolive Company (CL)vsUniversal Corporation (UVV)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Colgate-Palmolive Company generates 614% more annual revenue ($20.80B vs $2.91B). CL leads profitability with a 10.0% profit margin vs 2.9%. CL appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 1.55. CL earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 58/100 (C).

CL

Buy

58

out of 100

Grade: C

Growth: 4.0Profit: 8.5Value: 5.3Quality: 3.3
Piotroski: 3/9

UVV

Hold

45

out of 100

Grade: D+

Growth: 4.0Profit: 5.0Value: 6.7Quality: 5.0
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

CLUndervalued (+16.8%)

Margin of Safety

+16.8%

Fair Value

$104.97

Current Price

$87.55

$17.42 discount

UndervaluedFair: $104.97Overvalued
UVVUndervalued (+33.4%)

Margin of Safety

+33.4%

Fair Value

$79.32

Current Price

$53.70

$25.62 discount

UndervaluedFair: $79.32Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

CL3 strengths · Avg: 9.0/10
Return on EquityProfitability
36.4%10/10

Every $100 of equity generates 36 in profit

Market CapQuality
$69.90B9/10

Large-cap with strong market position

Operating MarginProfitability
20.9%8/10

Strong operational efficiency at 20.9%

UVV2 strengths · Avg: 9.0/10
Price/BookValuation
0.9x10/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

P/E RatioValuation
15.9x8/10

Attractively priced relative to earnings

Areas to Watch

CL4 concerns · Avg: 3.3/10
PEG RatioValuation
1.554/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

P/E RatioValuation
33.9x4/10

Premium valuation, high expectations priced in

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
3/93/10

Weak financial health signals

Price/BookValuation
1250.7x2/10

Trading at 1250.7x book value

UVV4 concerns · Avg: 2.8/10
Market CapQuality
$1.34B3/10

Smaller company, higher risk/reward

Return on EquityProfitability
7.0%3/10

ROE of 7.0% — below average capital efficiency

Profit MarginProfitability
2.9%3/10

2.9% margin — thin

PEG RatioValuation
3.062/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : CL

The strongest argument for CL centers on Return on Equity, Market Cap, Operating Margin.

Bull Case : UVV

The strongest argument for UVV centers on Price/Book, P/E Ratio.

Bear Case : CL

The primary concerns for CL are PEG Ratio, P/E Ratio, Piotroski F-Score. Debt-to-equity of 147.93 is elevated, increasing financial risk.

Bear Case : UVV

The primary concerns for UVV are Market Cap, Return on Equity, Profit Margin. Thin 2.9% margins leave little buffer for downturns.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

UVV carries more volatility with a beta of 0.59 — expect wider price swings.

CL is growing revenue faster at 8.4% — sustainability is the question.

CL generates stronger free cash flow (609M), providing more financial flexibility.

Monitor HOUSEHOLD & PERSONAL PRODUCTS industry trends, competitive dynamics, and regulatory changes.

Bottom Line

CL scores higher overall (58/100 vs 45/100). UVV offers better value entry with a 33.4% margin of safety. Both earn "Buy" and "Hold" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Colgate-Palmolive Company

CONSUMER DEFENSIVE · HOUSEHOLD & PERSONAL PRODUCTS · USA

Colgate-Palmolive Company is an American multinational consumer products company headquartered on Park Avenue in Midtown Manhattan, New York City. It specializes in the production, distribution and provision of household, health care, personal care and veterinary products.

Visit Website →

Universal Corporation

CONSUMER DEFENSIVE · TOBACCO · USA

Universal Corporation processes and supplies leaf tobacco and plant ingredients worldwide. The company is headquartered in Richmond, Virginia.

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?