WallStSmart

Colgate-Palmolive Company (CL)vsWaldencast Acquisition Corp (WALD)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Colgate-Palmolive Company generates 7342% more annual revenue ($20.38B vs $273.87M). CL leads profitability with a 10.5% profit margin vs -15.5%. CL earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 56/100 (C).

CL

Buy

56

out of 100

Grade: C

Growth: 4.7Profit: 8.5Value: 4.7Quality: 3.3
Piotroski: 3/9

WALD

Hold

42

out of 100

Grade: D

Growth: 8.0Profit: 2.0Value: 5.0Quality: 5.0
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

CLSignificantly Overvalued (-279.8%)

Margin of Safety

-279.8%

Fair Value

$22.51

Current Price

$85.49

$62.98 premium

UndervaluedFair: $22.51Overvalued

Intrinsic value data unavailable for WALD.

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

CL4 strengths · Avg: 8.8/10
Return on EquityProfitability
49.7%10/10

Every $100 of equity generates 50 in profit

Market CapQuality
$67.75B9/10

Large-cap with strong market position

Operating MarginProfitability
20.4%8/10

Strong operational efficiency at 20.4%

Free Cash FlowQuality
$1.28B8/10

Generating 1.3B in free cash flow

WALD2 strengths · Avg: 10.0/10
Price/BookValuation
0.2x10/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

Revenue GrowthGrowth
30.8%10/10

Revenue surging 30.8% year-over-year

Areas to Watch

CL4 concerns · Avg: 3.3/10
P/E RatioValuation
32.1x4/10

Premium valuation, high expectations priced in

EPS GrowthGrowth
1.1%4/10

1.1% earnings growth

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
3/93/10

Weak financial health signals

PEG RatioValuation
3.262/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

WALD4 concerns · Avg: 2.8/10
EPS GrowthGrowth
0.0%4/10

0.0% earnings growth

Market CapQuality
$232.49M3/10

Smaller company, higher risk/reward

Return on EquityProfitability
-6.5%2/10

ROE of -6.5% — below average capital efficiency

Free Cash FlowQuality
$-2.15M2/10

Negative free cash flow — burning cash

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : CL

The strongest argument for CL centers on Return on Equity, Market Cap, Operating Margin.

Bull Case : WALD

The strongest argument for WALD centers on Price/Book, Revenue Growth. Revenue growth of 30.8% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bear Case : CL

The primary concerns for CL are P/E Ratio, EPS Growth, Piotroski F-Score. Debt-to-equity of 147.93 is elevated, increasing financial risk.

Bear Case : WALD

The primary concerns for WALD are EPS Growth, Market Cap, Return on Equity.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

CL profiles as a value stock while WALD is a hypergrowth play — different risk/reward profiles.

CL carries more volatility with a beta of 0.26 — expect wider price swings.

WALD is growing revenue faster at 30.8% — sustainability is the question.

CL generates stronger free cash flow (1.3B), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

CL scores higher overall (56/100 vs 42/100). Both earn "Buy" and "Hold" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Colgate-Palmolive Company

CONSUMER DEFENSIVE · HOUSEHOLD & PERSONAL PRODUCTS · USA

Colgate-Palmolive Company is an American multinational consumer products company headquartered on Park Avenue in Midtown Manhattan, New York City. It specializes in the production, distribution and provision of household, health care, personal care and veterinary products.

Visit Website →

Waldencast Acquisition Corp

CONSUMER DEFENSIVE · HOUSEHOLD & PERSONAL PRODUCTS · USA

Waldencast Acquisition Corp. The company is headquartered in White Plains, New York.

Visit Website →

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?