WallStSmart

Canadian Natural Resources Ltd (CNQ)vsCalifornia Resources Corp (CRC)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Canadian Natural Resources Ltd generates 1039% more annual revenue ($38.76B vs $3.40B). CNQ leads profitability with a 27.9% profit margin vs 10.7%. CNQ appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 3.42. CNQ earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 67/100 (B-).

CNQ

Strong Buy

67

out of 100

Grade: B-

Growth: 3.3Profit: 8.5Value: 7.3Quality: 5.0

CRC

Buy

52

out of 100

Grade: C-

Growth: 2.7Profit: 6.5Value: 4.7Quality: 3.8
Piotroski: 1/9Altman Z: 1.83
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

CNQUndervalued (+76.9%)

Margin of Safety

+76.9%

Fair Value

$175.97

Current Price

$49.02

$126.95 discount

UndervaluedFair: $175.97Overvalued
CRCSignificantly Overvalued (-101.2%)

Margin of Safety

-101.2%

Fair Value

$28.22

Current Price

$66.96

$38.74 premium

UndervaluedFair: $28.22Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

CNQ5 strengths · Avg: 8.6/10
Market CapQuality
$102.25B9/10

Large-cap with strong market position

Return on EquityProfitability
25.8%9/10

Every $100 of equity generates 26 in profit

Profit MarginProfitability
27.9%9/10

Keeps 28 of every $100 in revenue as profit

P/E RatioValuation
13.0x8/10

Attractively priced relative to earnings

Free Cash FlowQuality
$2.31B8/10

Generating 2.3B in free cash flow

CRC2 strengths · Avg: 8.0/10
P/E RatioValuation
15.7x8/10

Attractively priced relative to earnings

Price/BookValuation
1.6x8/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

Areas to Watch

CNQ3 concerns · Avg: 3.3/10
Revenue GrowthGrowth
1.5%4/10

1.5% revenue growth

EPS GrowthGrowth
3.7%4/10

3.7% earnings growth

PEG RatioValuation
3.422/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

CRC4 concerns · Avg: 2.8/10
Altman Z-ScoreHealth
1.834/10

Grey zone — moderate risk

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
1/93/10

Weak financial health signals

PEG RatioValuation
14.362/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

Revenue GrowthGrowth
-13.8%2/10

Revenue declined 13.8%

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : CNQ

The strongest argument for CNQ centers on Market Cap, Return on Equity, Profit Margin. Profitability is solid with margins at 27.9% and operating margin at 19.6%.

Bull Case : CRC

The strongest argument for CRC centers on P/E Ratio, Price/Book.

Bear Case : CNQ

The primary concerns for CNQ are Revenue Growth, EPS Growth, PEG Ratio.

Bear Case : CRC

The primary concerns for CRC are Altman Z-Score, Piotroski F-Score, PEG Ratio.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

CNQ profiles as a value stock while CRC is a declining play — different risk/reward profiles.

CRC carries more volatility with a beta of 1.15 — expect wider price swings.

CNQ is growing revenue faster at 1.5% — sustainability is the question.

CNQ generates stronger free cash flow (2.3B), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

CNQ scores higher overall (67/100 vs 52/100), backed by strong 27.9% margins. Both earn "Strong Buy" and "Buy" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Canadian Natural Resources Ltd

ENERGY · OIL & GAS E&P · USA

Canadian Natural Resources Limited acquires, explores, develops, produces, markets and sells crude oil, natural gas and natural gas liquids (NGL). The company is headquartered in Calgary, Canada.

California Resources Corp

ENERGY · OIL & GAS E&P · USA

California Resources Corporation is an independent oil and natural gas exploration and production company in the state of California. The company is headquartered in Santa Clarita, California.

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?