WallStSmart

Canadian Natural Resources Ltd (CNQ)vsConocoPhillips (COP)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

ConocoPhillips generates 56% more annual revenue ($60.28B vs $38.76B). CNQ leads profitability with a 27.9% profit margin vs 13.3%. COP appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 3.16. CNQ earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 67/100 (B-).

CNQ

Strong Buy

67

out of 100

Grade: B-

Growth: 7.3Profit: 8.5Value: 7.3Quality: 5.0

COP

Hold

48

out of 100

Grade: D+

Growth: 2.0Profit: 6.5Value: 4.7Quality: 5.0
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

CNQUndervalued (+76.9%)

Margin of Safety

+76.9%

Fair Value

$175.97

Current Price

$50.55

$125.42 discount

UndervaluedFair: $175.97Overvalued
COPSignificantly Overvalued (-157.6%)

Margin of Safety

-157.6%

Fair Value

$43.18

Current Price

$126.92

$83.74 premium

UndervaluedFair: $43.18Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

CNQ6 strengths · Avg: 9.2/10
Revenue GrowthGrowth
150.0%10/10

Revenue surging 150.0% year-over-year

EPS GrowthGrowth
372.3%10/10

Earnings expanding 372.3% YoY

Market CapQuality
$102.42B9/10

Large-cap with strong market position

Return on EquityProfitability
25.8%9/10

Every $100 of equity generates 26 in profit

Profit MarginProfitability
27.9%9/10

Keeps 28 of every $100 in revenue as profit

P/E RatioValuation
13.1x8/10

Attractively priced relative to earnings

COP3 strengths · Avg: 8.3/10
Market CapQuality
$150.19B9/10

Large-cap with strong market position

Price/BookValuation
2.4x8/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

Free Cash FlowQuality
$1.29B8/10

Generating 1.3B in free cash flow

Areas to Watch

CNQ1 concerns · Avg: 2.0/10
PEG RatioValuation
3.422/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

COP3 concerns · Avg: 2.0/10
PEG RatioValuation
3.162/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

Revenue GrowthGrowth
-6.8%2/10

Revenue declined 6.8%

EPS GrowthGrowth
-39.0%2/10

Earnings declined 39.0%

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : CNQ

The strongest argument for CNQ centers on Revenue Growth, EPS Growth, Market Cap. Profitability is solid with margins at 27.9% and operating margin at 19.6%. Revenue growth of 150.0% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bull Case : COP

The strongest argument for COP centers on Market Cap, Price/Book, Free Cash Flow.

Bear Case : CNQ

The primary concerns for CNQ are PEG Ratio.

Bear Case : COP

The primary concerns for COP are PEG Ratio, Revenue Growth, EPS Growth.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

CNQ profiles as a growth stock while COP is a declining play — different risk/reward profiles.

CNQ carries more volatility with a beta of 1.06 — expect wider price swings.

CNQ is growing revenue faster at 150.0% — sustainability is the question.

CNQ generates stronger free cash flow (2.3B), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

CNQ scores higher overall (67/100 vs 48/100), backed by strong 27.9% margins and 150.0% revenue growth. Both earn "Strong Buy" and "Hold" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Canadian Natural Resources Ltd

ENERGY · OIL & GAS E&P · USA

Canadian Natural Resources Limited acquires, explores, develops, produces, markets and sells crude oil, natural gas and natural gas liquids (NGL). The company is headquartered in Calgary, Canada.

ConocoPhillips

ENERGY · OIL & GAS E&P · USA

ConocoPhillips is an American multinational corporation engaged in hydrocarbon exploration. It is based in the Energy Corridor district of Houston, Texas.

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?