WallStSmart

Canadian Natural Resources Ltd (CNQ)vsConocoPhillips (COP)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

ConocoPhillips generates 54% more annual revenue ($59.38B vs $38.63B). CNQ leads profitability with a 25.1% profit margin vs 12.3%. COP appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 0.99. COP earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 58/100 (C).

CNQ

Buy

58

out of 100

Grade: C

Growth: 2.0Profit: 8.5Value: 7.3Quality: 6.5
Piotroski: 6/9Altman Z: 2.05

COP

Buy

58

out of 100

Grade: C

Growth: 2.0Profit: 6.5Value: 5.3Quality: 6.5
Piotroski: 4/9Altman Z: 2.29
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

CNQUndervalued (+50.8%)

Margin of Safety

+50.8%

Fair Value

$83.51

Current Price

$45.70

$37.81 discount

UndervaluedFair: $83.51Overvalued
COPSignificantly Overvalued (-89.9%)

Margin of Safety

-89.9%

Fair Value

$58.64

Current Price

$119.27

$60.63 premium

UndervaluedFair: $58.64Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

CNQ6 strengths · Avg: 9.0/10
P/E RatioValuation
11.8x10/10

Attractively priced relative to earnings

Return on EquityProfitability
30.3%10/10

Every $100 of equity generates 30 in profit

Market CapQuality
$91.79B9/10

Large-cap with strong market position

Profit MarginProfitability
25.1%9/10

Keeps 25 of every $100 in revenue as profit

Price/BookValuation
3.0x8/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

Operating MarginProfitability
21.8%8/10

Strong operational efficiency at 21.8%

COP5 strengths · Avg: 8.2/10
Market CapQuality
$136.77B9/10

Large-cap with strong market position

PEG RatioValuation
0.998/10

Growing faster than its price suggests

Price/BookValuation
2.3x8/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

Operating MarginProfitability
22.1%8/10

Strong operational efficiency at 22.1%

Free Cash FlowQuality
$1.35B8/10

Generating 1.3B in free cash flow

Areas to Watch

CNQ3 concerns · Avg: 2.0/10
PEG RatioValuation
3.422/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

Revenue GrowthGrowth
-1.2%2/10

Revenue declined 1.2%

EPS GrowthGrowth
-45.3%2/10

Earnings declined 45.3%

COP2 concerns · Avg: 2.0/10
Revenue GrowthGrowth
-5.3%2/10

Revenue declined 5.3%

EPS GrowthGrowth
-20.2%2/10

Earnings declined 20.2%

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : CNQ

The strongest argument for CNQ centers on P/E Ratio, Return on Equity, Market Cap. Profitability is solid with margins at 25.1% and operating margin at 21.8%.

Bull Case : COP

The strongest argument for COP centers on Market Cap, PEG Ratio, Price/Book. PEG of 0.99 suggests the stock is reasonably priced for its growth.

Bear Case : CNQ

The primary concerns for CNQ are PEG Ratio, Revenue Growth, EPS Growth.

Bear Case : COP

The primary concerns for COP are Revenue Growth, EPS Growth.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

CNQ carries more volatility with a beta of 0.88 — expect wider price swings.

CNQ is growing revenue faster at -1.2% — sustainability is the question.

COP generates stronger free cash flow (1.3B), providing more financial flexibility.

Monitor OIL & GAS E&P industry trends, competitive dynamics, and regulatory changes.

Bottom Line

CNQ scores higher overall (58/100 vs 58/100), backed by strong 25.1% margins. Both earn "Buy" and "Buy" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Canadian Natural Resources Ltd

ENERGY · OIL & GAS E&P · USA

Canadian Natural Resources Limited acquires, explores, develops, produces, markets and sells crude oil, natural gas and natural gas liquids (NGL). The company is headquartered in Calgary, Canada.

ConocoPhillips

ENERGY · OIL & GAS E&P · USA

ConocoPhillips is an American multinational corporation engaged in hydrocarbon exploration. It is based in the Energy Corridor district of Houston, Texas.

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?