Canadian Natural Resources Ltd (CNQ)vsCross Timbers Royalty Trust (CRT)
CNQ
Canadian Natural Resources Ltd
$49.02
+1.32%
ENERGY · Cap: $102.25B
CRT
Cross Timbers Royalty Trust
$9.50
-3.55%
ENERGY · Cap: $58.32M
Smart Verdict
WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison
Canadian Natural Resources Ltd generates 689382% more annual revenue ($38.76B vs $5.62M). CRT leads profitability with a 79.1% profit margin vs 27.9%. CNQ trades at a lower P/E of 13.0x. CNQ earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 67/100 (B-).
CNQ
Strong Buy67
out of 100
Grade: B-
CRT
Hold39
out of 100
Grade: F
Intrinsic Value Comparison
Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula
Margin of Safety
+76.9%
Fair Value
$175.97
Current Price
$49.02
$126.95 discount
Margin of Safety
-70.8%
Fair Value
$5.03
Current Price
$9.50
$4.47 premium
Key Strengths & Concerns
Side-by-side fundamental analysis
Key Strengths
Large-cap with strong market position
Every $100 of equity generates 26 in profit
Keeps 28 of every $100 in revenue as profit
Attractively priced relative to earnings
Generating 2.3B in free cash flow
Keeps 79 of every $100 in revenue as profit
Strong operational efficiency at 77.9%
Attractively priced relative to earnings
Areas to Watch
1.5% revenue growth
3.7% earnings growth
Expensive relative to growth rate
Smaller company, higher risk/reward
ROE of 1.9% — below average capital efficiency
Weak financial health signals
Trading at 25.7x book value
Comparative Analysis Report
WallStSmart ResearchBull Case : CNQ
The strongest argument for CNQ centers on Market Cap, Return on Equity, Profit Margin. Profitability is solid with margins at 27.9% and operating margin at 19.6%.
Bull Case : CRT
The strongest argument for CRT centers on Profit Margin, Operating Margin, P/E Ratio. Profitability is solid with margins at 79.1% and operating margin at 77.9%.
Bear Case : CNQ
The primary concerns for CNQ are Revenue Growth, EPS Growth, PEG Ratio.
Bear Case : CRT
The primary concerns for CRT are Market Cap, Return on Equity, Piotroski F-Score.
Key Dynamics to Monitor
CNQ profiles as a value stock while CRT is a declining play — different risk/reward profiles.
CNQ carries more volatility with a beta of 1.06 — expect wider price swings.
CNQ is growing revenue faster at 1.5% — sustainability is the question.
CNQ generates stronger free cash flow (2.3B), providing more financial flexibility.
Bottom Line
CNQ scores higher overall (67/100 vs 39/100), backed by strong 27.9% margins. Both earn "Strong Buy" and "Hold" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.
This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.
Canadian Natural Resources Ltd
ENERGY · OIL & GAS E&P · USA
Canadian Natural Resources Limited acquires, explores, develops, produces, markets and sells crude oil, natural gas and natural gas liquids (NGL). The company is headquartered in Calgary, Canada.
Cross Timbers Royalty Trust
ENERGY · OIL & GAS E&P · USA
Cross Timbers Royalty Trust is an express trust in the United States. The company is headquartered in Dallas, Texas.
Visit Website →Compare with Other OIL & GAS E&P Stocks
Want to dig deeper into these stocks?